Unless it’s just a hardware driver issue?

  • marsokod@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you are in an enterprise environment, it is easier to sell Ubuntu - at least there is a company that can provide support for it behind. Companies want to make sure someone is on the hook to fix an issue that would be blocking to them, and this is much harder with something like Debian.

    That’s why Red Hat is used that much in companies, and what Canonical main revenues are coming from.

    But as a selfhoster, I use Debian by default for my servers. Only if there is a very specific need for Ubuntu would I switch, and I am frankly tired of the Snap shenanigans on my desktop (thinking of migrating to PopOS or KDE Neon).

    • huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve really enjoyed Neon. It still has snaps, but everything going through the Discovery app makes installs of flat oaks or snaps seamless.

      PopOS is great but threw me for a loop with its lack of GRUB.

  • JesterRaiin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Support & community come to mind.

    To a typical user/newcomer to servers it’s easier to find some solution for Ubuntu, than for Debian. And boy, can Debian users be full of themselves… 😑

  • nik282000@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ubuntu has a bigger market share in the support department. Makes it easier to find advice that applies specifically to your setup.

  • garrett@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Having worked at a cloud provider for awhile and also done support, the reasoning is generally that Ubuntu is the “path of least resistance” to getting running. They have a super engaged community and the market share leads to a lot of guides across the web being primarily made for Ubuntu.

    To be fair, it also helps that their LTS support is really nice and their repos are a lot closer to up-to-date than a bunch of others.

  • RegalPotoo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    In years past, I chose Ubuntu over Debian because of some key packages that were more up to date on Ubuntu LTS then Debian. Now that I’m running basically everything in containers I’ll be switched back to Debian over the next upgrade cycle

    • Sethayy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Anytime is an upgrade cycle when youre indecisive as hell

      (Almost don’t even use my PC cause its always migrating somehow lmao)

    • Bradley Nelson@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is huge for me as well and is what will keep me on Ubuntu Server until I have a very very good reason to leave or someone else adds it.

      • elderflower@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Think it’s not supported for the root filesystem anymore but that’s not my usecase anyway. Still supported for non root filesystems.

  • iliketrains@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most people only relate Linux to Ubuntu, Linux init system to SysVInit or SystemD, Containerisation to Docker or Kubernetes, Linux desktop to Gnome.

    In some cases, it may be due to official support being available but most of the time it’s just that people are being taught Ubuntu first as “THE Linux” and that’s what they use since then.

        • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Too convoluted, fit into bureaucracy and contains incentive for RedHat to not make it easier to understand. I say we shoot the entire project but that’s not going to happen with Debian and Arch using it (I cried the days they made the switch, respectively)

          • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hopefully IBM kills redhat with their shit touch like everything else and put them out of our misery.

            • MigratingtoLemmy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Our misery indeed. But will doing that give Suse the monopoly over RPM-based distributions in the enterprise space? I don’t know. I’m happy as long as Rocky and Alma figure something out

              • InvertedParallax@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                You’re not wrong, but at the same time suse is one of the oldest distros, and having worked with them they seem to have the best attitude, I’ve never seen them be dicks about anything to anyone.

                Still, never good to depend on anyone lest they turn out evil, but I’ve hated redhat since they started, they wanted to become Microsoft from the beginning and all their code looks like it came straight out of Redmond.

                So I don’t see it getting worse at least.

  • s_s@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    One of Ubuntu’s strengths from an enterprise perspective is that it produces server and desktop solutions that require minimal cross-training to support both.

  • Veraxus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Historically I’ve done exactly that. Debian for servers, Ubuntu for workstations (because I like GNOME). But my hate for Snap runs so deep that I’ve started using Debian w/ GNOME more and more often over the last year or so.

    • ThorrJo@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      But my hate for Snap runs so deep that I’ve started using Debian w/ GNOME more and more often over the last year or so.

      As a Linux Mint user I’ve seen the writing on the wall and will be switching to Linux Mint Debian Edition next time I reinstall my desktop.

  • ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I don’t think it matters but I usually pick Ubuntu as the base for my server(s) just because I tend to always go back to an Ubuntu spin as my daily driver. It’s better to just have it be the same.

  • HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I’m a bit of a noob so I ended up going with Ubuntu after trying a few other distros. I’m sure I could have fixed the issues I was having but it was easier to troubleshoot and find solutions online due to the larger install base.

    Also more things were just working out of the box

  • Deebster@lemmyrs.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    When I last used Debian, I found myself very annoyed with the lag in the package manager. This is a very long time ago (15 years?), so probably isn’t the case any longer. However, due to laziness (or proactively avoiding a bikeshed rabbit hole) I didn’t check and just chose Ubuntu over Debian the other day because of that.