It would be a long hard time.

If the hostages are returned it’s harder to justify his genocide.

lol

Sorry, just replace weed with crack.

Say what you will, the Apple Silicon Macs are real fuggin good.

Gotta get that probable cause to search for weed.

This just proves we need comprehensive regulation regarding what constitutes a fursuit.

Terms like sensible gun control aren’t very helpful though, it’s vague and noncommittal.

I’m interested in your furries only gun control bill.

No matter what side of the gun debate you are on, most can agree the NRA is a fucking joke.

Can I get a free trial of the bag?

Maybe the mass produced soft drinks are the problem.

No, you see courts only apply this precedent when it can hurt poor people.

There is stiff competition in that category.

Yeah, a myth according to which source again?

Your second point literally says exactly that. You’re inching as close to justification as you can while maintaining plausible deniability.

Echos the exact same mentality of holocaust denial claims that the Jews were both a dangerous evil and simultaneously treated with utmost dignity.

At no point did I say the tank man was run over.

I’m not sure many people even claim he was.

You argue both that there was no massacre and that violent force against the protesters was justified if it did happen.

Seems like one is meant to excuse the other if disproven.

But I shall play the smallest violin for those poor unarmed tanks killed by violent protesters and their terrifying grocery bags.

We will make them, through the might of the Helldivers.

The Chinese state like all states reflects purely the will of the state.

For example, I don’t think slaughtering protesters at Tiananmen Square was reflecting the will of the working class.

What it was reflecting was the will of the state to preserve its own power.