Itakes perfect sense really. They want to be able to legally execute their political enemies and anyone ideologically opposed to them.

Blood eagles were only mentioned by Christian skalds hundreds of years after the viking age. There is zero contemporary historical evidence that vikings ever practiced that form of execution.

I don’t know anything about sponsor agreements. Just because the sponsors don’t have direct access, that doesn’t mean there aren’t other ways for them to get that information.

Big tech is the problem. Indie tech is still cool as shit.

Sounds like a you problem. You fucked up so everyone needs constant surveillance? Fuck that authoritarian nonsense and fuck you for supporting it.

Their chips kinda suck ass though

YouTube knows exactly where you start and stop the video, what segments you skip, etc., etc. and the channel has access to those analytics. Not saying that anyone shares that with the sponsors, but the mechanism IS in place.

That Mitchell and Webb Look! Hilarious British sketch comedy show, and if you enjoy it, check out Peep Show by the same comedians, David Mitchell and Robert Webb. Even funnier IMO!

🏴‍☠️

Dude, rain water is full of pollutants too. 😂

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

How is that not blatantly false? Piss off troll.

They weren’t idiots either. They weren’t stupid enough to think technology was static and would never improve, firearms technology was literally improving during their lifetime. They wrote the constitution the way they did deliberately. The constitution was meant to be a living document, true, but the only reason to change that amendment is, simply put, fascism.

That law was added when guns were so imprecise it was difficult to hit the broadside of a barn from inside the barn.

That’s blatantly false. Timothy Murphy killed a British officer during the Revolutionary War at a distance of 300-400 yards. They absolutely had the capability of precise marksmanship at the time the constitution was written. Repeating rifles were not a foreign concept either. They weren’t common yet, but there was no reason for them to believe the technology wouldn’t be improved.

No, you are. Literally read the goddamn title of the thread.

They enforce plenty of draconian shit just fine, I think they can find a way.

If they represent public affairs, they should be beholden to the electorate. Fuck this hiding behind private institution bullshit.

That’s the entirety of this thread, that if companies are being reimbursed, then people should also be reimbursed.

And the company should be legally held responsible go reimbursing its customers.

Everybody involved should be at 0 tarrifs. Why should Nintendo be +1 and all their customers be -1?

There’s records of customers buying products at inflated costs due to the tariffs as well. They absolutely can refund people if they get a refund.