Adventure time
Adventure time
I heard there are quantum computing libraries in Python if that interests you!
If I were you I’d browse PyPi for any packages that look cool.
I’m not exactly sure what to think about it, but I do like how there’s specific things that have their implementation in code right there. I did only look at the site for like a minute, so take that with a grain of salt.
I know it’s a dumb idea but imagine how fun it would be if there was no copyright
That idea of booting from a USB is golden.
Oh, I didn’t realize a lot of people actually believed that I just figured they were being hyperbolic.
I wouldn’t take the meme so literally that they’re only talking about current quarter profits, but just that they want growth in general.
I didn’t know that, thanks!
Omg there’s a lot more than I realized there would be. I really appreciate going out if your way like this!
This looks like a really cool library, but I don’t have any experience in color. Are there any resources you’d recommend to learn before/while using this library?
This is so bad I can’t look away
Thanks, that was a lot of info I didn’t know either. I was wondering how to use clippy…
I’ve been working on a scraper to get congress stock trades. I’m thinking of potentially just serving it as an API. If theres an API that someone else knows about I’m all ears.
The problem with interpretation is that, if you can make a convincing argument about why something should be seen a specific way, youll have people see it that way. Same thing here. I agree that it’s a possible interpretation, but it also just depends on who you’re talking to. Point being others in the comments with wildly differing views, but with justifications that are equally as valid. Who knows what’s the right interpretation, your guess is as good as anyone’s.
Namecheap bc I typed where to buy cheap domains and that was the first one.
Can someone drop a Jesus pun for this. I can’t think of any
The article made a few good points, but a good amount of it was conjecture. I liked the part about comparing the two functions and showing that exceptions are faster but I think a big thing he’s not getting is readability. Even in the functions he showed, you can directly see that the one using std::expected has the happy path and error path directly in the function signature, whereas the exception one doesn’t.
As for the “error kind” trap he was talking about, that definitely exists, but ignores the fact that you can also get this same kind of error from exceptions. I’ve definitely gotten exceptions that I didn’t understand from Python or Java libraries, but it’s not a problem with exceptions but a problem with how they’re shown. If there’s nothing to tell me that I should have thought of that error, it shouldn’t be an expectation for a dev to have thought of it.