Hmm. Based?

Well damn Jackie I can’t control the weather!

I really appreciate posts like this. Thank you for making Lemmy a better place!

“I may not have a brain, gentlemen… but I have an idea”

Monsters vs Aliens. One of the most fun and referenceable movies of all time.

And it plausibly helps support the snow. There is a legitimate purpose.

“They charge developers too much!”

So you should be able to undercut them, right? Right?

“We sent them a letter and so we’re demanding a right to do it.”

That’s LITERALLY what they did lmao

Are you? Because now we’ve agreed on every fact to determine my conclusion is correct. Yes they do want people using their product; they want to lure in customers. Wasting tokens generating unhelpful output would both drive customers away with a worse experience, and cost them more money. So there’s no reason for them to do that. Like I said in my first post.

Creating additional tokens LOSES them money. For a single token, the cost of generating it exceeds the profits.

I genuinely don’t understand what would drive someone to be this condescending when you don’t even understand the argument I have clearly laid out four times now.

Because they currently lose money for every token sold. They’re operating at a loss to generate a userbase so that they can monetize later. They’re currently in the pre-enshittification (I still don’t like that word) phase where they want to offer a good product at a loss and lure in customers, not phase 2 where they monetize their userbase.

I don’t think this really addresses my second point.

Hmm, interesting theory. However:

1. We know this is an issue with language models, it happens all the time with weaker ones - so there is an alternative explanation.

2. LLMs are running at a loss right now, the company would lose more money than they gain from you - so there is no motive.

Why would it be by design? What does that even mean in this context?

The point is that if your suggestion earlier in the thread was optimal, you wouldn’t need to teach your children something different

The rare double ambiguity: “work on” and “work with” could both have two meanings with opposite effects in the sentence

Yeah, any real gamer has it built into their chair

The pigeon technique, just do it while in motion. Brave

Not sitting in your own piss and shit is for women and gay people obviously