It was called cringe anarchy because it made fun of anarchists.
They were a lot more peaceful than some “mostly peaceful” protests.
I truly do not agree. Reddit has played games with changing the definition of hate speech constantly. Many subs that were well moderated were closed for very minor things that weren’t upvoted. And if Reddit admins sit down to dinner with pedophiles (repeatedly, and only throw them out after mass protests…)
I completely disagree. CA in particular was quite well moderated and didn’t brigade either. Reddit admins were notorious for using these as excuses to target subs they wanted to get rid of, while being lenient against other subs (AHS was basically a dedicated brigading sub! But merely saying something negative about certain subs could get an immediate warning.)
I think it would be a fun feature to have a quick copypasta like “I see you’ve posted something critical of conservatives in the conservative community. We’ll allow it because we support free speech, but try posting (insert link to negative article about dems) in r/politics and see what happens!” Either that or we say “this community is for conservative members to discuss conservative issues” and link them to something like c/debateconservative
Try posting anything that looks critical of democrats on r/politics like “totally reproducible psych study proves dems are all idiots!!!” and see if it stays up.
I’m interested. I can only help a little bit, but I’m eager for non-echochamber coms
Now I can eat popcorn while watching some couple’s life burn to the ground around them, but without the icky feeling (from supporting Spez’s empire, that is).
Pro gun, pro choice… not a lot of candidates for me to pick from, hah!