Isn’t the rule about hair not going past eyebrows or ear lobes? Every picture I’ve seen of this dude meets that requirement. I really don’t understand the reasoning behind the violation?
Isn’t the rule about hair not going past eyebrows or ear lobes? Every picture I’ve seen of this dude meets that requirement. I really don’t understand the reasoning behind the violation?
I’m holding off until a new version. Doesn’t necessarily need to be faster, but I’m sure they’ve learned a ton with this release. Interested to see their 2.0 release.
Reporting in from US. The only results supporting this article are from the article itself. Garbage outlet. You should really just delete this post. It’s literally the driving force behind what you are complaining about.
tbf, this is probably suburban / rural areas to move back into urban areas that are already having crises. Won’t fix any of the housing markets in high population centers.
That looks miserable
Not paying as much as someone currently makes doesn’t necessarily mean they are underpaying. Could be a different industry, department, etc.
Okay but being better able to detect X doesn’t mean you are unable to detect Y well enough. I’d say the physical attributes of children and dark-skinned people would make it more difficult for people to see objects as well, under many conditions. But that doesn’t require a news article.
Tbf, most of the reasoning behind the “help” you got for smoking was because it actively endangers those around you. Alcoholism, by an extremely large margin, affects those around you much less.
Good call. I didn’t even think to specify household vs personal. My mistake. I’ll edit to fix.
What are the good resources? Because I just searched “Canada wildfire info” and got the Canadian Wild land Fire Information System" seems like a good place to start? Stop using Facebook for this shit (or anything else)
Median income is $23k in Thailand. $31k in US. It definitely doesn’t make up the difference.
Edit: Used Personal income for US and Household for Thailand. It actually doesn’t bring the gap significantly closer.
But that’s not what this is. This is just an ad. Not a “since you like X, try Y”
You say wsj is reputable, and then suggest filtering Murdoch. Murdoch bought wsj in 2007.