Communist, parent, techie and hobbyist artist. Learning Rust and tired of frontend development.
While I agree, corporations shouldn’t make bucks on knowledge(sorta) they basically eavesdropped and violated the privacy of millions of people for.
AI solutions are made from people’s ideas, and should be freely accessible by the people by definition. It not being sustainable as a business model is also a feature in this case, since there’d be no intrinsic incentive to steal data and violate privacy.
This thing will also possibly ban books that weren’t ever written. Just as dumb and full of BS as the Republicans that want to use it smh
That’s not from bad apps… If anything this new policy will make me use the mobile website instead of the app.
I’d also consider switching banks if it isn’t too much of a hassle. They clearly can’t invest well in terms of security for their users.
Every day we’re here just to learn billionaires & families should be crushed and their wealth redistributed amongst third world countries.
“It’s got, huuuu(5 minutes pass)uuuuhhhh, MUH FREEDOM”
In their 40s at the current rate.
Manufactured consent at work
As does every US tech giant. We’ll run out of mountains
Flatseal is a life saver
Especially since if you question it you’ll die by the “invisible hand of the market” and be labelled an example on why any system other than capitalism can’t actually work.
Thanks again for the release, Jerboa is getting better really quickly!
I know about how you, all the way from the west, consuming only western media and participating in western politics, knows more about the east than eastern folks themselves. All the eastern countries and the global south know about what western people believe.
Likewise. I’d like to see how your “version of the facts” goes on the eastern countries. Have a good day.
Starving families =/= massive landowners. The ones hit by the famine were the families working for the landowners, most of them owned no land at all. If you want to blame someone, blame rich folks being pissy about not being able to exploit families on their farms anymore
That logic about Stalin destroying the farms himself doesn’t even work. The country needed the farms and crops as much as any other country building an army. Are you gonna say next that he ordered the eating of babies and kicking of dogs?
I’m not Stalinist btw, but history has facts, and landowners who were having their farms taken and wanted to make the communist party’s life harder are a fact. Bourgeoisie will be bourgeoisie no matter which country.
When someone brings Holodomor they’re not even trying to understand what they’re even blaming, so out of tiredness, I don’t bring up the fact that the ones who ruined the farms and crops were the rich private landowners who didn’t want their properties to be turned over to the state. Holodomor is a capitalist genocide in what was a communist country.
Think for a second: why would a country building an army, needing healthy adults, purposely cause a famine?
Meanwhile every western genocide is about racism, slave-labour and exploitation of the land. Every single one.
Also, nice fallacies you’re throwing out there, like that ad hominem at the end, truly marvellous.
Then I’m glad to be your acquaintance, comrade. We might have different ideas on how things could be better and how to fight for them, but we definitely know what the real issues are.
So by those rules you imply the whole west is genocidal and Nazist?
Every western power is genocidal and imperialist, and most crises currently ongoing are way worse than that tired example you gave. Do you just care if the suffering population is white?
Also, about allying with Nazis: after WW2, who brought home Nazi high officials and gave them positions of power in their own countries again? USA and UK, if you don’t remember.
Afaik it’s consensus for communists to be both anti-NATO and anti-Putin, as is my case. But since lots of people now just use “tankie” as a derogatory term for “communist” instead of “Putin supporter and Russian supremacist”, I felt like making the distinction was a good call.
Yup, the problem is firmly the system, but suggesting a worldwide change to socialism/communism is less “palatable” and believable by the average person.
So “eat the rich” is a decent compromise for a comment not intended to approach any sort of complex answer, while still being a move in a better direction than suggesting things to continue as they are.