Ononotagain

If only they had someone worth voting FOR.

He asked what would happen in the city if the ordinances were to remain blocked.

“The city’s hands will be tied. It will be forced to surrender its public spaces, as it [already] has been,” Evangelis said.

This is the crux of it. The city does not consider the homeless to be the “public”. Can’t be homeless and a citizen at the same time apparently.

To make this clear, this is a about the government further destroying the entire concept of “public spaces”. Dividing further who counts as “the public”.

Given the opposite land Putin lives in, me new expectation: Russia launches AA against NATO F-16s and uses this statement as proof it must have been Ukraine who did it.

Too big to fail = to big to leave to corporate capitalism. If it is so important to our nation, then nationalize it.

Not trying to pick a fight, but having regulations is not the same thing as regulating. At least not in the context of this thread.

5 whole years to see a return on investment! Regulation has gone too far! /s

What a weird way to phrase it. I mean wouldn’t a headline like “Peacock raises prices after less than 3 years” be more accurate? I know inflation has been off the charts but, there is no way subscription services raising prices every couple of years is going to be sustainable. (It already isn’t)