deleted by creator

Just by reordering the words to “shoots activist dead.” Done. Copy editor job unlocked.

There’s actually a biological reason for this, believe it or not. Language and music “time share” many characteristics of both hemispheres of the brain. Language and music are processed in different hemispheres.

Read pages 20-26 of the book “How Music Really Works” by Wayne Chase. It breaks it down in detail.

It’ll drop from “iron clad support” to “iron plated support” for Israel.

Special interest money (Looking at you, AIPAC) needs to be removed from ALL political influence, too.

He won quite a number of primaries in 2016. We were robbed of a better past future.

He’s trying to get Trump riled up, which would make him even more chaotic and frantic. This is a tactic to get under the skin of his most useful idiot. Putin knows he could reel him back in with a word.

I went to a Sanders rally in 2016 here in Seattle. I went on to be a county Delegate for the caucus - our last caucus, thankfully. The energy was huge, the people were absolutely stoked, and the arena was 100% packed with lines wrapping around outside.

Downvoting for the use of an uncommon word.

Inevitable. As the Chinese proverb goes, “Make noise in the west while striking in the east.” The war in Gaza is but a means to distract now, allowing bad behavior elsewhere to go relatively unseen.

While I agree with you, I can’t entirely discount /u/oakey66. History has proved it for decades.

How did you get that from my comment?

You either refuse to acknowledge all the terrible things he’s done, or you approve of the things he’s done.

This is two ways. You literally said either / or.

Indeed.

I’m guessing someone on /c/vegan took umbrage with the fact that cats are obligate carnivores and didn’t want to hear anything else.

Edit: I find my upvote/downvote ratio unbelievable for this comment. Astounding how controversial facts are.

I didn’t say they did. I was speaking with exposition, not specificity. It was a nuanced and more broad discussion on the topic of bias in general.

Why is reading comprehension so hard for you? I wrote clearly.

This is a form of bias on their part. They think or say it’s being balanced, but the lack of full factual disclosure is a choice. Bias can show up in other ways, too.

The length of a segment, for example. How long a topic is covered shows bias through emphasis or lack of emphasis.

Omission of details, over-covering points of view while ignoring others, when a story is covered, who covers the story, etc., may all seem unimportant, but they are choices.

Bias isn’t necessarily bad if it’s factual. To your point, someone should be stating who this individual was - even just generally - and state something along the lines of what you’re saying to refute the “mentally ill” allegations.

Because the moment you threaten their money is the moment they take action.

This is what I used and it worked great.

https://redact.dev/

For the times that I go back on to Reddit, I follow up and delete my comments a few weeks later using this.

I would have loved Name of the Wind, but that lazy fuck Rothfuss is going the way of George Reorge Reorge Martin: he’s been promising book 3 for a decade and can’t finish it.