I read somewhere that people in Asia won’t tilt on things like eye or hair colour being different immediately since their so used to black hair/brown eyes that they just filter it out and use other cues.

This also means that people who look identical to say a European are considered to look nothing alike.

Looking at your examples, and I have to object at putting scratch in there.

My kids use it in clubs, and it’s great for getting algorithmic basics down before the keyboard proficiency is there for real coding.

Why the down vote? Average age in gaza is 19 (yes mean is not median but still). This means that you have a good chance that a large proportion of those killed were kids (and almost all weren’t of voting age last time gaza had an election).

No, that last one’s zoophiliac, but probably works too.

My bet is that in 2 years we’ll see a stark devide in talent in traditional Vs remote first companies with the latter getting pick of the litter so to speak.

Same in France.

Malicious compliance, I like it.

Clearly enough are that this problem is pervasive accross several police forces. It’s clearly the case in the US, and we have a similar problem with the Police National in France (bizzarly, the Gendarmerie who performe policing outside the cities and are a part of the armed forces seem to have far less issues in this regard…)

Technically it’s their client that’s putting the thumb screws to them.

If that’s the case the logical solution is to put your commercial hat on and find another client. Amazon aren’t the only ones paying.

If Amazon was your only client that’ll be tough, but speaking from experience if you don’t diversify your client base, you’re living on borrowed time anyway.

This doesn’t mean Amazon are not being abusive, but the solution isn’t to moan on the internet.

Don’t worry, it’s business insider India, nothing to do with the reputable site.

Parceque un porc ou un boeuf ça design aussi l’animal.

I’d totally be down for that kind of community.

DM me if you set it up too.

The point is that they’ve established a relationship between o16 levels and temperature, so if you’ve got twice the o16 then say it was 25% warmer (made up ratio, I haven’t read the study).

This doesn’t tell us what the air temperature was, but it does tell us what it wasn’t (IE upper and lower bounds).

When you have several of these proxies it helps narrow down the temperature range (think how your god works better when you have more satellites).

Now if you know that the last seven days are the hottest on record and you know from your proxies that you are outside of temperatures of the past 100k years then it’s a pretty safe bet to state that we’re at the hottest time in the past 100k years.

There is no melodrama or lying in this fact, unfortunately.