We can with enough money. We already established we can build stuff in orbit and send stuff to orbit. All you need to get to mars is a larger rocket. So assemble it in space and go to mars. It’s the same problem of going to the moon just with more delta v.

Did you hear about that boat that recently made it to Antarctica? Yeah, me neither.

We should have gone to mars by now, but all the funds went to child raping fascists and bombs apparently

Sweet, push to production.

But the second is talking about abuses against males. If anything, using two words “dismissed, and sacked” one in each paragraph, makes it even more confusing. Felt like it was saying women in senior positions protected women less (dismissed abusers) while protecting men more (sacking abusers). Just say sacked both times.

What ecosystem collapses when removing a single creature? Are you talking about pre-holoscene extinction ecosystems? Or are you talking about modern ecosystems (after most of the original biodiversity has already been obliterated, and “removing one species” is actually thousands down on the list of removals)?

I actually kind of like it. It means my internal model of reality becomes a little more accurate.

I still probably use some flimsy, too much energy to discredit argument back though if they were dicks about it, or I am drunk.

I find on a system with minimal RAM that shit gets super expensive really fast.