honestly, good. let people like this stay in their swamp of antiquated, headache inducing tools and systems.

WHERE DID THE COWS GO

I dont think taxing them will accomplish much. its also trivial for corporations to evade taxes, and all of the big ones do.

I think the ease of raising money is part of the problem. Loads of tech companies way over-raise, and develop into bloated cancerous messes that have no way of ever realizing the growth that would have to exist to warrant the investment theyve been given.

In the first place, the only way their investors even expect make anything back would be by reselling the stock, making it a ponzi asset.

The entire system is just propped up by peoples 401ks being funneled to institutional investors. Its inherently unstable.

Make social security good enough that middle class citizens dont need to invest, and the overinflated value of stocks plummets back to earth.

I think the people that built a company are better qualified to elect their ceo than the bulk populus. Gotta be democratically elected by workers imo, though a simple majority isnt always the best way.

Your questions at the end are what distinguish this from a co op.

Im not saying i have an answer for every case, but a co op has strictly one vote per employee.

I think itd be okay to build on top of that and let co-ops of more than 2 people set up some sort of charter or constitution that requires periodic re ratification.

3 is the minimum amt of employees that makes sense imo.

answered this one here : https://lemmy.world/comment/17993835

Well, if you want to tax billionares out of existance u need a wealth tax, aka unrealized gains.

taxing unrealized gains is just going to force individuals to sell their business to liquidate the cash to pay their taxes. Institutional traders will buy them up, so youre universally taking control out of the hands of people and giving it to banks and hedgefunds, which will just end up owning eachother.

I dont think any billionares exist that made their money in some other way than selling stocks in a business they acquired at a lower value, aside from inheritance or divorce.

Maybe you do implement a wealth tax anyway though, but you do it after abolishing stocks, just to catch the loopholes.

im definitely interested in not collapsing the world financial system, but its a tough problem to find a solution to.

there are other assets besides stocks banks could own - loans would definitely be a much bigger part of the pie.

As for starting a business, itd make sense to only hire on people you trust at first. Afterward you have to continue to show your worth not to investors but to employees.

As an alternative to trust, you could cut your own business a loan, so that if youre ousted as long as it doesnt go tits up you still get a payout.

love fairphone but i cant go bacl from graphene os. its so nice not having google attacjed to everything.

I should hope signal adds sms support back with this.

C# is good too. If you havent heard of lobster you should look into it.

Rust is esperanto because its only actually used by a small group of nerds,

python is russian because everything made in it is unreliable.

Copyright =/= liscence, so long as they arent reproducing the inputs copyright isnt applicable to AI.

That said they should have to make sure they arent reproducing inputs. Shouldnt be hard.

true but if its truly end to end encrypted it cant be moderated.

between this and mega its clear they want your files easy to reach and access, privacy and security be damned.

the internet should be free for the same reason we have the 2nd amendment - its necessary for exposing and opposing tyranny.

so kill telegram and watch criminal orgs and militant groups just spin up their own servers or use encrypted radio or just encrypt messages themselves to send through any other platform.

its the cops and feds job to investigate these people, they didnt need a fucking all seeing AI to do it in the prior century and they dont now.

i mean seriously what happened to sting operations? its so damn easy to catch predators n shit on discord, and these telegrams are easy enough to join. do actual detective work smfh .

once mecha break comes out next year, mecha break. its waay more fun and teamplay is just as important if not moreso.

Yeah mega transfers. 1 transfer is 8 bytes. the DD in DDRX is double data so it can send 2 transfers per channel per clock. CPUs pretty much always use 2 channels, so the formula is just GBps = 32 * MT/s. My PC has 6000MT/s DDR5 in a dual channel config so thatd be 192GBps.

Idk how apple is getting above 300GBps, maybe theyre counting the integrated GPU as part of the total. GPUs often have 4 or 6 or 8 channels so thatd make sense…

so to briefly answer the question in the title after reading the article : i dunno maybe prepared statements

Windows is as much to blame as any affected languages tbh.

For what its worth , the cache locality of Vec<Box<Dyn trait>> is terrible in general, i feel like if youre iterating over a large array of things and applying a polymorphic function you’re making a mistake.

Cache locality isnt a problem when youre only accessing something once though.

So imo polymorphism has its place for non iterative-compute type work, ie web server handler functions and event driven systems.

so if (somehow) the accumulator was an integer, this loop would autovectorize and the performance differences would be smaller ?