I struggle to think of what that extremely secure infrastructure would look like. Are you imagining signing on an electric terminal and having a computer compare signatures at the time of sale? That seems like the most secure and still wildly insecure compared to a pin.

And, the next ultra-big step: How would a non-techie figure this shit out?

They don’t have a computer, another computer with a different OS, or bitwarden.

Do you think signatures were at all secure? If they cared about security they’d do chip+pin like most civilized countries.

You can’t see something small right behind you with that.

Implying he only makes executive orders about things he has a say in.

Social studies was history? And civics and economics and religion/philosophy and geography. It’s just the overarching name for the study of human society.

No, that was certifying the election (where Congress counts the electoral votes). Inauguration is the 20th.

6 days until that happens.

We often don’t have handicapped bathrooms, but a handicap stall in the gendered bathrooms.

Having seen the illustrations of fetuses for the first several months, I think we might have even more. They definitely don’t look like a baby at first.

What do you think those are? Because I’m pretty sure they’re just screenshots of people’s microblog posts. Exactly like this.

They specifically made a community for microblog screenshots here. What are you expecting the content to be?

Then don’t get a job at a defense company. If you don’t want to provide abortions, don’t get a job at a hospital.

Something like 15% of hospitals in the US are Catholic hospitals.

I think I might be misunderstanding. If he felt he wasn’t smart enough to get anything out of college, isn’t it better that he not go? Like it seems more spoiled to go to college without the expectation you’d get the degree. You’re taking a spot from someone who thinks they’ll graduate, wasting your parents’ money, and delaying becoming a self sufficient adult for no pay off.

I think your ratios are backwards? ((1*75%)+(2*0%))/3= 25% but ((2*75%)+(1*0%))/3=50%

Edit: unless it’s anything 20% to 50% that works.

The goal is to mess up price history. So it will have a list price of $50 but with a coupon to make it $35. Then a sale day happens and they lower the price to $40. It’s 20% off! Good deal.

It doesn’t really help if you’re comparison shopping with alerts. I don’t know that Amazon thinks you’re going to go to another site.

You don’t want drug addicts being solely responsible for a newborn baby do you? The only way to be sure that doesn’t happen is to test people.

I don’t know if the original intention was just that naïve or if it was always sinister, but it’s definitely used in discriminatory ways and does more harm than good.

Additionally, my wife has recently started watching Gossip Girl but I only catch glimpses of that show. Did anybody actually like that show when it came out?

If you think of teenage girls as people, tons of people liked it when it came out. They also liked the books.

We have tons of video evidence of cops planting evidence for smaller things than this.