• 6 Posts
  • 103 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 19th, 2023

help-circle


  • so first things first. pogroms and volyn were terrible and seems like Ukraine is working through that.

    the point i’m making here is that the binary “worked with nazis” leads nowhere, and we have to bring things into the historical perspective.

    today we have the luxury of retrospective and know what fascism is and its dangers. which, ironically, doesn’t seem to stop us from sliding into it.

    things were very different and slightly less binary in 1941. after all, the German American Bund (aka First US Nazi party) was dismantled only in December 1941. to make matters worse, germany, france and poland were all researching on the “re-settling” of jews to madagascar: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madagascar_Plan

    what makes a difference for me is that while the main nazis (germans, italians, japanese and soviets) were all about “we are better, let’s enslave the neighbor monkeys”, ukrainian nationalists in that time were about fighting against occupation. polish, soviet, nazi and then again soviet. in that order.

    they lost, and as usual with history, it’s written by the winners but the fact that (the modern nazi) ruzzia appears to have inherited fear of bandera from the (fairly nazi) soviet union, tells me that it’s worth looking at him not only from the ruzzian perspective.






  • I personally prefer an analogy of a surgeon. Cutting people with sharp objects is bad, but when it’s for the benefit of a patient, it is a lesser damage and thus acceptable. Utilitarianism, if you like.

    Those dead Russians came with an intention of killing as many Ukrainians as possible to achieve the aim of their leader. Killing them is a shame, but it’s the last available measure to reduce the number of people killed.

    So to your question, if wishing to stop the killings makes one Ukrainian, then yes, everybody here is one. I thought just humans, but sure.







  • it’s fascinating that from the headline it’s absolutely unclear whether the protests are even related to the 16 kills. if i were glancing (and wasn’t aware of the situation), i would’ve thought that 16 were killed as Israeli finally listened to the protesters or something.

    “protesters in Israel” (must be some foreigners) vs “Israeli strike”.

    while they actually demand a ceasefire that will allow for release of hostages, and their government does everything to avoid that ceasefire. oh, and then there’s “strike kills 16” leaving it ambiguous whether military or war crimes.

    also ceasefire implies both sides are fighting. from what i can tell Hamas pretty much stopped fighting almost two years ago.

    “Israeli protesters demand their military to stop attacking Gaza, as Israeli army kills 16 civilians and journalists in an attack on a hospital in Gaza in another apparent war crime”.

    how about now?