

He’ll back down like he always backs down. He doesn’t have the patience to be a true warlord, he’s the laziest man alive, he gets bored of things even when he’s not the one doing the work.


He’ll back down like he always backs down. He doesn’t have the patience to be a true warlord, he’s the laziest man alive, he gets bored of things even when he’s not the one doing the work.


No needs a narrative to make America look bad. The Americans do it to themselves.


Is the article pay walled? I can read it in its entirety. I’d happily copy and paste it into the comments but it’s probably against the rules.


The goal is to be at war. The US is always at war. There is always an enemy to fight, if there is no convenient enemy to fight then you go to some random country, invade it, and thus create an enemy, who they proceed to then lose to.
For bonus points you should kill as many civilians as possible while claiming to be the liberators. Also you should, on the way out, backstab as many people that assisted you as possible.


Anytime anybody tells you “I don’t do drama”, 99% of the time they are the cause of all the drama.
Actually chill people pretty much never bring it up.


You don’t know anything about software development do you.


Copy editing won’t be an executive’s job. But yeah, they didn’t do the bare minimum which is concerning, it seems to indicate that they may not do the bare minimum on all of their articles. How much stuff went undiscovered?
I’m not going to outright say that journalist shouldn’t use AI to write articles, because it’s basically an enforceable rule, but there should be someone at some point whose ultimate responsibility is to make sure that the articles are at least factual, whether they were written by a human or not. Determining whether a quote is legitimate is pretty easy, you just have to Google the quote, if you can’t find any other sources you start to ask questions. As I said it’s the bare minimum they could have done.


I sincerely doubt that a collision in low earth orbit is going to result in debris being flicked up into geostationary orbits, the energy differences involved are just monumental.


Little bit of a nitpick but Kessler syndrome doesn’t care about how many satellites you have, and more about how many dead satellites you have hanging around on random orbits. You could put hundreds of millions of satellites in space as long as you had some sort of decommissioned program. You can always send up rockets if you can just move the satellites out of the way / know where they are.


None of the moons in our solar system have atmospheres. Earths moon is too small to hold on to an atmosphere, and the Galilean moons of Jupiter are too cold for an atmosphere, the gases just freeze.
The best place would be either a space station in low earth orbit or of the L4 or L5 point. The data issue would be the problem though I suppose you could just use the data centres for training but not for active processing but then you would need to build data centres on earth for that.
Given that you’re going to build the earth data centres anyway you might as well do all of the processing on earth at the same time.


Yes I’d like to build data centres on Uranus one of the most distant planets in our solar system, and also one without a solid surface but who’s counting.


Most people who use teams do so on work devices, I can’t just install Linux on it.


The explanation is earlier in the quote you just copied. They’re using it as a CDN

Yes this is the artistic light. It’s the light that adventurers see when they go into caves


Yeah but he doesn’t want Trump to have the technology.


It’ll fit right in. They’re looking to automate their corruption.


They’re all invested in each other, a threat to one is a threat to all and up until now the regime hasn’t threatened their investments.
Seriously there’s a graph somewhere showing who’s invested in what and basically it’s all just one thing now. I don’t know why they maintain the charade of being separate companies.
And the reason they don’t want their technology being used to kill people is because they don’t trust the administration to keep it to foreign countries in the middle East where no one cares what happens. They’ll use it in the United States and everyone will know who’s technology is powering their drones.
All that’s happening is that financial self-interest and ethics both give the same answer in this scenario.


My understanding is that the RAM architecture is built around insanely quick read write access but doesn’t really store data for more than three or four seconds at a time. Most modern programs expect the RAM to hold on to the data for basically however long they need until they access it. So most programs just won’t fit into memory configured like that, and I think it’s a hardware thing, not something you can change with software.


You can’t run normal programs on their weird AI architecture. This is the problem everyone has with all of the ram as well, when the AI bubble pops we won’t get loads of cheap RAM because it’s all configured for AI and doesn’t really work on anything else. They can’t just pivot, that’s why they’re so eager to make AI a thing.
It wasn’t that secret though was it? People knew about it, they just didn’t do anything about it.