I’m not sure the UI/UX is anyhow related to kernel development.
I3/Sway/Hyprland/other WMs are already much more superior to anything that can be achieved in Win/Mac desktops in terms of flow and performance. Only polishing is needed. Other desktop options like Gnome/KDE are fine and more lightweight desktops are okay too. They need polishing too, but already great.
In fact it would help game development as much as “similar” approach helps the web grow the way you don’t need to reinvent the wheel every time. Although you can.
Also can be last cash grab before leaving with a golden parachute, as industry doesn’t feel healthy
Although it’s generally good idea, you will have hardware/software issues in the future. As I remember there is LTSB out there and it was pretty solid, but in times I used it long ago, I already had a lot of issues that required hours to find a workaround.
Typical loop in this case:
In a few months/years
That should be in the FAQ
Be careful not to replace bash with fish as some systems fail to work with new shell. I usually init fish/nu shells with other instruments, like alacritty and/or zellij
FPS itself is not as important as consistent and low frametime.
If frametime graph is pretty much flat the stuttering would be low and overall experience is nice, but if it’s janky one would like to drop the game or decrease quality settings pretty fast.
Typical M$. Pushing half-baked and bugged products just to take a market share.
JSDoc: am I joke to you?