What the fuck? Was it not clear from context that “I don’t give a fuck about the Clintons” meant “I don’t give a fuck about protecting them from the consequences of their actions?”

Clearly you’re looking for something to be outraged about, but my comment ain’t it.

Trump today: “Take the homes first, go through due process second.”

There is no evidence for the second half of that.

“Nationwide” is sanewashing. It’s really expanding specifically to blue states (because its real purpose is punishing the regime’s political enemies).

First of all, LOL, what a clown move by a clown committee.

Second, I don’t give a shit about the Clintons and neither should anybody else. I would have loved for them to be held accountable for contempt, if it weren’t for the fact that the committee itself lacks credibility and deserves it.

Third, I’m just hoping for the silver lining that liberal Democrats learn the hard way what they should’ve done with that power, back when they had the chance to wield it against MAGA fuckwads legitimately.

Not radioactive enough, and way too tropical to be a suitable punishment. My vote would be the South Sandwich Islands, but I’d also accept St. Helena (where they sent Napoleon) if marooning them on an uninhabited polar island is considered too “inhumane” or something.

Shut it down. Shut it all the fuck down!

I don’t even want the Democrats to condition it on demands anymore. I just want them to obstruct completely as a matter of principle that fascist government is worse than none at all.

[Microsoft are] just literal thieves.

Always have been.

(But now it’s worse because it’s the entire public, not just their competitors)

“Obstruction investigation” – yes, the investigation is obstruction.

Reported for sanewashing. I don’t care if the title matches the article; it’s propaganda and we shouldn’t put up with it.

What disgusting cope. Don’t you have any self-respect?

Just because you can work around the abuse doesn’t mean they aren’t abusing you.

Edit: people like the commenter above are actively making the world worse by normalizing and even excusing abusive corporate practices. I apologize for nothing!

Sure is a good thing Ubuntu doesn’t sometimes sneakily install a Snap when you try to use apt to install a package, such as with Firefox. Tricking users into using Snap without realizing it, making them unknowingly vulnerable to exploits like this, would be really really bad and unethical on Canonical’s part.

There have been a few others, but we don’t remember them because they failed.

That’s the pettiest shit I’ve ever read.

Let me guess, you’re a “business man”?

I’m no arborist, but I think the reason the branches get too tall and break easily is because you’re pruning it wrong. It’s so desperate to grow that it’s sending up water sprouts instead of having proper branching.

EMOLUMENTS CLAUSE

Why would you pollard an olive tree?

“Get your car out of the bike lane” gets 'em real mad every time.

IMO Jupyter notebooks are a good example to look into first, if you want something more contemporary and somewhat widely-used than “tangle and weave.”

It would require 3D printers sold in New York to include technology that blocks the unlicensed production of firearms and gun parts. It would also make it a crime to possess, sell or distribute digital blueprints for printing illegal guns.

This is an attack on my property rights as a 3D printer owner, never mind the Second Amendment (or First Amendment, for that matter). In practice, this would essentially require all 3D printers to have closed-source, DRM’d firmware and almost certainly spy on you. It is way, way more authoritarian than people only thinking in terms of “gun violence” likely give it credit for.

Also never mind that “is this 3D model a gun?” is an absurd thing to have a computer try to figure out, even with the recent advances in machine learning. That goes double if you care about things like distinguishing a gun that would actually shoot bullets from a water gun, nerf gun, or other vaguely gun-shaped nonfunctional object (which any frothing-at-the-mouth jackbooted thug who would stoop to supporting this clearly wouldn’t). And even then, guns are fundamentally simple devices made from multiple parts – is it going to SWAT you for printing a cylinder because it might be a gun barrel?!

This proposal is dangerously insane in every conceivable way, and probably several other ways I haven’t even thought of yet.