Bullshit. California has no jurisdiction over people in one-party consent states.
The California court decision it cites (Kearney v. Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. (2006)) is being misinterpreted: the “Georgia” party in that instance was a corporation that also does business in California, and that is what made it subject to California law. The notion that its precedent creates some “general rule” is a blatant fucking lie.
“Act like an idiot and you’ll see” “fuck around and find out?”
I can’t remember what it was about, but I think Kavanaugh was actually on the correct side of a non-unanimous ruling maybe once.
Literally zero times for the other two, of course.
How can I ever thank ya?
(Seriously though that is actually the brand and capacity I need to match my existing array, although a red instead of a blue would be ideal.)
One HDD, please
Which is why using it should be considered harmful and everyone should say “Free Software” instead.
LLMs are AI - always have been. The term “artificial intelligence” has always been broad in computer science: it covers anything that performs a cognitive task normally requiring human intelligence.
On the contrary, it’s not “AI” unless it’s a fuckton of hand-programmed if statements. I dunno what this newfangled “neural network” shit is, but it’s way too brain-like to be AI! \s
Seriously, who thought it was a good idea to prevent people from blocking or ignoring channels they hate?
Sociopaths (euphemized as “marketers”) whose entire business model is based on forcing you to see things you hate.
You’d be better off asking for a whitelist of channels that aren’t.
Georgia is thinking of doing the same…
…along with ending a bunch of tax breaks on a bunch of other stuff, including some that might actually deserve them (rent-controlled apartments, EV chargers), and using it all as an excuse to cut the income tax even though the revenue gained wouldn’t even come close to offsetting the revenue lost.
https://www.wabe.org/big-georgia-income-tax-cuts-would-come-with-costs-to-residents/
peertube… maybe with torrents?
That’s already how it works.
There are so many people who worry about Peertube’s viability because of bandwidth costs – or straight-up claim it’s impossible – because they don’t realize it’s already a solved problem.
A presidential candidate from a non-state US territory (other than DC) would absolutely break MAGA brains.
So why is this news? It’s a delusional “gotcha” demand that NATO has no power to grant (short of denying countries that want to join), and you just admitted it’s not new.
“Russia to demand legal codification of eastern European countries’ lack of sovereignty”
NATO doesn’t “expand” (edit: in an imperialist way, which was utterly obvious from context). Countries choose to join it. Russia wants to remove that choice.
There’s also Good Eats.
I watched a lot of cooking shows on TV as a kid, just because I liked them. (DIY shows too, BTW, which is why I’m also comfortable doing my own home maintenance.)
I tried to crosspost, but it didn’t seem like it acted like one so I edited it to add a link to the original post.
It’d be nice if you could just write !suspiciouslyspecific@lemmy.world in a comment on the original post and a bot would make the post here for you.
Who cares, as long as it’s copyleft?
In addition to some of the other criteria mentioned, some other indicators of a bad person are: