Yeah your point totally stands for sure. I mostly replied because everyone I know treats the bible as some static, unchanging thing and I think that influences religious propagation because it kind of buries how such an important religious book came to be. Granted this is by design to help push the religious tenets and imply inviolability.

I probably shouldn’t have used the term “organically” since the changes would be intentional and manipulative/manufactured. At a high level that is probably just human nature though so from that sense it kind of was organic.

Anyways yeah, there is nothing like a chain of custody on any of this stuff, it’s been translated between languages many, many times. Contradictions, lack of chain of custody, discarding of translation biases, all of them are problematic and are generally dismissed by those faithful. I think that’s part of the point for them, their faith covers those things. I don’t understand it but I can appreciate how it helps some people. I wish people didn’t also use it as an excuse to isolate and hate but I think that is more about humans being flawed than the concept of religion in general…

We won’t ever know for sure but treating the contradictions in the Bible as intentional is probably giving more credit to the people who initially created it than they deserve.

More likely, they just just didn’t really plan it out and instead shit was added piecemeal over time ultimately leaving a lot of contradictions.

Anyways, it seems much more likely that this happened organically rather than being intentional.

I don’t think I’ve actually played any of those so I can’t speak to them but hopefully someone else can. There is a website you can check compatibility on although I don’t know if it includes non-games and/or tools. Arizona Sunshine looks like it’s fine: https://www.protondb.com/search?q=arizona+sunshine

If it’s gold or higher it’ll almost certainly play without issue. Silver will very likely play if you tweak the compatibility settings to change proton versions (go to game options in steam > compatibility > change the version. Bronze is hit or miss, you’ll likely be able to get it to work but it might require more work. Borked is of course…borked.

Anyways, someone else can probably answer those games specifically but if not you can use the website to check.

Switched to Linux a couple years ago and at this point it is rare that a game doesn’t “just work” and even rarer when it still won’t work after trying other versions of proton in the Steam compatibility settings for the game.

Depending on if there is a specific game you know doesn’t work that is a deal breaker for you, it might be fine at this point to switch. Just throwing that out there. You may not need more compatibility than what is available.

Might end up with more humanity in business decisions by replacing the empathy-devoid CEOs currently running things with something trained on a larger sample of people.

Like all things in life there is balance that must be maintained. A language with few features but super detailed documentation is ultimately going to be less useful than a language with more features but not as strong documentation.

Obviously you want perfect documentation and full features but it just isn’t realistic so you have to balance things to your requirements. So I went with 5 because the balance between language features and documentation is going to change based on requirements.

Yeah, it’s like going to a restaurant and only judging the food by the restaurant’s decor. It is arguing something that doesn’t matter and most people get over it after they’ve worked in a number of languages.

It just doesn’t matter and instead adds noise to the language feedback loop for something that isn’t changing and isn’t a problem to begin with.

The main point I took away from your comment, and the thing that I think is missing in most of the other comments, is application of this concept to the real world. You nailed it. Always read the manual is a nice sound bite and something that can be flippantly thrown around to feel superior but that is terrible advice without any context.

What it should say is: Always refer to the manual.

Part of being a human is prioritizing tasks based on need and/or want. Another part is understanding your personal needs to accomplish a task. Reading a manual may provide value. Spending the 2 hours with family also provides value. If I choose the latter I can still refer to the manual when needed.

It drives me crazy when people double-down on some distinct thing (always read the manual) and then preach that it should always be the case or apply to all situations. There is a concept of diminishing returns and people should teach how to figure that out rather than blast out a good sound bite. Let people identify what works for them and be respectful of that. I’m not sure why that is such a hard concept for people.

We talked about this in my software engineering course back in 2001. Surely we can start acting on these finding a quarter century later right? Right?? Joking (I guess?) aside, this really should be taken more seriously.

For the most part it is just soul crushing to constantly be interrupted but people legit die because of software errors due to these kinds of things. You think someone who has 30 minutes free a day to do code reviews for a whole team is going to do a good job, regardless of their intention?

Software is driving cars, flying planes, scheduling trains, pretty much everything in modern life. Yet we are fragmenting our codebases, micromanaging to the point of focus and productivity loss, and to make up for that we are trying to leverage ai tools that were rushed to market. Buckle up folks, we are in for a bumpy ride.

It makes sense, you aren’t telling sql server how to do something, you just tell it what you want and it figures it out. You aren’t even doing procedural stuff at that point.

I like the RAD tools being qualified as 4GLs as I haven’t really thought of them that way but again it makes sense.

Also screw PowerBuilder. I am sorry if anyone in this thread likes it…but it is seriously awful.

Edit: Before people jump me, I do know that you have some influence over execution plans with join orders, hints, etc… but by and large you don’t tell SQL Server how to do it’s job.

The - works with git branching as well for those who didn’t know. git checkout - will switch to the previously checked out branch so it effectively toggles between your two most recent branches.

This is a huge one for me. For those who don’t know, this brings up the rev-i-search utility which allows cycling from most recent to oldest commands executed. It also supports partial finds so if you did ‘cd’ it would cycle the most recent change directory commands.

The forward search (in case you’re somewhere in the history stack) is ctrl+s and operates the same except crawls the command history forwards.

I use these constantly in my normal workflow and they save a ton of time.

Can anyone see the token person of color or did they not even bother this time?

Yeah and unfortunately it’s going to get worse when AI agents are also always running in the background (which is inevitable, let’s be honest).

I get what you are saying and this is definitely a factor but I think the bigger influencer was mobile adoption. As soon as smartphones took off it was inevitable that we would see a surge in cross platform frameworks/libraries.

The fact we tackled this problem by shifting everything to web apps was also inevitable given the more simplistic deployment requirements and maintenance costs of a website vs native application.

I feel like I am shouting to the void when I talk about performance of modern software being unbelievably bad.

One could say they are streets behind.

Not the OP but just wanted to say thanks for typing that out. I think it perfectly answers the question, gives several examples/explanations, and provides further research resources. It’s always genuinely great to come across posts like this.

This person obviously has their own way of doing things that works for them and that’s great. Some of his views are patently absurd though. This is mostly commenting on his reasons against using a forge and not a comment that he should do something differently.

Trust

100% fair and I think this is the main take-away from the blog post. If you don’t trust something, don’t use it. Full stop, the post could have ended there and been fine. But then it goes on to say:

You get a workflow imposed on you

You mean like forcing people to use email to submit pull requests to your self-hosted git repos? It doesn’t matter what you are doing, if you are working on an open source project you are going to have workflow limitations. This is arguing a fallacy.

In particular, your project automatically gets a bug tracker – and you don’t get a choice about what bug tracker to use, or what it looks like. If you use Gitlab, you’re using the Gitlab bug tracker. The same goes for the pull request / merge request system.

Nothing is forcing you to use these features so just don’t use them. Plenty of teams use 3rd party tools but host their code in a forge site. Having options available to you automatically is not the same thing as being forced to use them. If it was, JIRA wouldn’t exist because everyone would use github/gitlab/whatever’s built-in issue tracking and project management.

The majority of the post comes across as someone who just doesn’t like the forge sites and aside from the trust aspect, then spent a bunch of effort trying to create associations and limitations between things that don’t exist.

Trust is 100% the main reason not to use a forge site and all the other things cited are superfluous and/or very subjective.

It’s hard to truly internalize this but no matter what you think about something and/or how wrong you think someone else is, we are walking through life with imperfect imaginings of what other people think and feel. Trying to make sense of people is even harder than making sense of a person. And we are quite literally incapable of truly knowing what goes on in someone else’s head.

Definitely ask these questions but don’t drive yourself crazy if people don’t make sense. The behaviors and actions we witness in others are only the emergent characteristics of a lot of brain activity that we aren’t privy to.