Anti rollback shoud have exceptions for when new software is bad/broken, you would be able to unlock/disable this feature (with some boot alerts or something).

deleted by creator

It’s not that bad that you might think, the db user just need to have readonly access permissions to specific database tables.

Ofc all data in tables ofc need to be public, so more like simple public facing page, app should not have any notion of users in any way, data probably populated by some automated system, and UI just to make it easier for anonymouse users to view that data in a friendly way.

On top of that it will be a hell for the sysops as they will need to know the whole db structure and such of even a single part of db would contain non-public data, but that overall the best guy to handle security in the first place.

And because all data is totally public in the first place you could give the task of creating frontend to any junior or LLM and it will be still secure.

But in truth it is very bad idea (even it it is possible), because most likely the database connections would be reused so you could for example change current connection session timezone or other params and that ofc would nit change the data in db but still could affect other users by showing wrongly formatted or shifted data.

Sorry, didn’t read other comments, so it is already known bug :)

Found the cause for my observed issue, if you grab the timeline by the text box then the text is moved inside the box.

Recording: https://nextcloud.dlk.pl/s/qfzCXsGXXPHq5mD

Text size dorsnt change, the viewport gets bigger and the text get shifted to a correct position like fixing itself.

But i only saw that like handfull of times.

It’s some sorts of a bug, as it changes it size/offset if you interact with it in some ways. Has that multiple times but didn’t know how to reproduce it or if its not even only on my phone (fairphone 5)

Fake news, CEO and all emplyes are getting pay’d in full, it doesn’t matter if they sell the product to its users or sell (user data) to their sponsors or share the data internaly, it doesnt matter that the service model itself is not profitable as they make the rest from selling a (fake?) promises.

Same with many others like Youtube, they are also “not profitable” on paper as a standalone service. It only mean they are using you, selling your data or selling some promises.

If they would actully not be profitable then they would rise prices or just disapear and some other company would arise but with srtategy that is at least sustainable.

Open source devs can be losing money, as the pay from their own pockets.

I would like to see at least one person in that company that is not getting money from it but fund it from own money.

I think all people that see that ads need to pickup a phone and call them asking stupid questions and waste their time, they clearly ask you to do that.

Step 4 - success - Attention aquired. 😅

Better/fastest approch would be to check the last bit of the int and return the result. Second use modulo.

This? Dev should burn in hell. Who created this?

I just hear that they move to LibreOffice but not to Linux, ateast not right now.

On top od that it takes more vertical space so more % of the video is covered by controls that are not that transparent so the whole control block is covering it in full comparing to previous where only the actual icons and text did cover the video with the gradient to help make it visible if video is the same color.

But one way or another I avoid yt so it doesnt really affect me.

Those certificates should not exist in first place. That is just a bad design.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dQw4w9WgXcQ

https://lemmy.rip/ doesn’t have a valid SSL which might be a problem.

But most likely they use all of those recordings accidental or not to serve you targeted ads, like Google does.

Few hours later on timeline:

https://lemmy.world/post/23832012 (Apple randomly spying using microphone)

It sounds like jest plain simple website/forum BUT with specific protocol making it more discoverable/searchable?

Allowing to post comments anonymously… sound like a bad idea in the long run, but who know, make me eat my words.

I did saw You could also use Tailscale and use their internal signed certificates. Then you can access it both internally and remotly over Tailscale with SSL.

Personally I own a domain for years and just use it.