So you’re saying that the GDPR makes it illegal for individuals to use surveillance for self defense. That’s not true. Recital 50 specifically allows people to share data with law enforcement. And if you’re referring to putting up cameras, that’s actually very ineffective at reducing crime while it does expand mass surveillance.

A state-department funded propaganda outlet with a “controversies” Wikipedia section longer than any I’ve seen. Yet MBFC gives it the highest possible rating?

That’s an obvious lie. If you bothered to actually read the report, you can see on page 2 that the vast majority of shots are coming from Israel.

Why the password.trim()? Silently removing parts of the password can lead to dangerous bugs and tells me the developer didn’t peoperly consider how to sanitize input.

I remember once my password for a particular organization had a space at the end. I could log in to all LDAP-connected applications, except for one that would insist my password was wrong. A trim() or similar was likely the culprit.

These scams are convincing enough that countless people fall for them. Blaming them individually is not going to bring us any closer to a solution. Better fraud detection and mitigation will.

You know very well that’s not what I said. But please educate me why nuclear armageddon is good, actually.

It scares me that anyone could come to this conclusion. Are you so clueless about the unimaginable, unprecedented suffering and death that such a conflict would bring, or does your emotional attachment prevent any rational assessment? There is no reality where WW3 and “not necessarily a bad thing” belong in the same sentence.

It’s a good thing to punish territorial aggression, but there can be no doubt that WW3 is the worst outcome for everyone.

🤔🤔🤔 https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Just_asking_questions

Not my idea of a good date, but to each their own

Why do you keep posting articles from CIA-funded outlets?

Such is the fate of hypercentralized spaces. The fediverse fixes this.

Would there be any evidence that could satisfy you, or are you just looking for a reason to dismiss this?

peace

(Subject to availability in your area)

They are not above the law, because these is no law in the US that regulates how social media platforms should be moderated. This is new territory. The EU only recently passed the Digital Services Act that broadly deals with this topic.

If you genuinely don’t see that as a problem, I’m concerned for the safety of women around you.

Deliberately taking the most negative misinterpretation of what was said. It almost feels like Reddit again.

deleted by creator

There are enough mundane explanations for why a satellite can, in fact, burst into 100 pieces.

Ah yes, the unenlightened peasants cannot be trusted to form their own opinions. In fact, why let them vote at all?

RCS is walled off by design, so that users are dependent on Google and their phone carrier. If they wanted an open standard they would have adopted something like XMPP.