Basically, if his gun isn’t holstered they can claim all kinds of things like he reached for his gun, or an accidental discharge, or all kinds of excuses for shooting a guy. It helps them frame the situation as dangerous and chaotic.

The broader goal? imo: For the officers: To hurt a guy. The way they treat people makes me think they like hurting people. For the feds: to ‘raise the temperature’ and agitate, presumably to incite retribution.

Im aware the 2nd paragraph reads like classic tinfoil hat stuff. But I’m not alone in thinking it’s true.

I would guess for facade. Because disarming him after would make it too obvious.

I think the killing was rehearsed. Not necessarily for Alex specifically.

1] The shooter stares continuously at the disarmer placing his hand on, then removing Alex’s gun. This lasts for multiple seconds.

2] The shooter maintains arm-to-arm contact with the disarmer, a move commonly taught so you know where your partner is and what they’re doing.

3] The shooter pauses before drawing his own gun. When he draws it coincides the disarmer removing Alex’s gun

4] Upon disarm, the disarmer immediately turns around and runs. They don’t pause when the shooting starts

5] Upon disarm, the shooter immediately fills the space left by the disarmer.

deleted by creator

What possible reason could immigration officials have to patrol the Super Bowl with guns?

Trump raises taxes on Americans. Again.

deleted by creator

Selfish people. They only care whats best for them. No care for others, no care for society.

tldr

We don’t know what gas grenade it is or what’s in it. But there is old data from grenades that look similar, and those old grenades are safer than normal tear gas grenades.

But we don’t actually know what they are. They could be anything.

The “State’s Rights” crowd is gonna love it. Unironically.

It’s not about immigration enforcement