Nothing you say will make a lithium ion battery into a high explosive. There is no combination of words you can say that will make that true.

By setting the battery gauge level-high to an invalid selection that is also greater than the low level it creates a bridge between the anode and cathode, resulting in thermal runaway which will in fact cause the battery to overload and explode due to the increased temperatures.

First part of this is gibberish. Second part is just describing a short of the battery, which will destroy it, but is completely inconsistent with video footage which shows small high explosive charges going off. That is not how battery shorts happen. This was not done in software, there were actually explosives installed in the devices as reports are starting to now state. But you know, good job on the sheer volume of words you wrote.

Just so you know, we can tell you don’t know what any of that means.

This empty-brained chud will 100 percent vote for Trump in November.

Charlize Theron is one of the most beautiful women of all time and won her Oscar for playing someone…not that. What I’m saying is that I honestly think Kathy Bates has the acting chops to pull it off.

Why are you like this

The wise thing is to not offer perpetual licenses in the first place. You can’t predict the state of your business in 10 years let alone beyond that. Why make commitments that? Marketing of course. So if they’re going to raise capital that way (by one-time revenue from sales of perpetual licenses) then they can’t just decide that perpetual doesn’t mean perpetual anymore. All in all this will come down to a legal duel between expensive legal teams.

Some people are able to understand context.

Given the state of Xitter, I would argue that his control of Starlink is significantly more dangerous.

You couldn’t even refute those idiotic points properly.

My brother in Christ, they invented paper, fireworks, and the compass.

True. And irrelevant.

Because they developed more efficient engineering techniques and more advanced methods of industrial scale production. In the same way Japan ate the American auto industry’s lunch during the 80s and 90s by investing heavily in industry and education, China is flooding the zone with talented professionals and capital improvement projects.

And because the Chinese government is heavily subsidizing their auto industry in order to gain market share works wide. Pros for us: if we can buy these cars, the Chinese government is essentially subsidizing them for our consumers. Cons for us: without equivalent subsidies domestic car companies can’t possibly compete. There are genuine issues of trade fairness in play here.

The Chinese middle class is the largest in the world.

Relevant only if the Chinese middle class is who is working in those car factories. Is that the case?

I’m not even saying the tarrifs are good or bad. If they’re explicitly time boxed and our governments are able to stick to that deal, then they could be good. But in general tarrifs on EVs during a climate crisis driven by carbon emissions is explicitly counterproductive.

It seems to me, all the bag holders should have grounds to sue them, I’m sure atleast a few of them will.

Sure but they’ll have to balance that probably legitimate cause if action with the fact that they’ll likely get death threats from cult members for filing the suit.

Because they make it easy and do a few cool things.

“Do you want a mic in your home that can record everything you say and do and send that data off to wherever the company chooses?”

“No of course not.”

“What about of it will also turn your lights on and off and play despacito on demand?”

“You son of a bitch, sign me up”.

They’re not being actively held hostage in that there’s no giant prison with all their families in it.

They are being held hostage because of the implication. The whereabouts of their family is well known so are they going to toe the line? Of course, because of the implication.

The fact that this tweet caused their stock price to dive really shows what a joke the stock market is .

I think it’s what we call Xitter.

Because the 5 billionaires who own most of the media stand to benefit materially from Trump returning to office.

Remember folks, there are delusional centrists who love this guy and think he speaks for the working man.

Your comments is literally just ad-hominem too bruh.

The part where that matters. Your discourse is directly counterproductive to your stated goal.

If you cared about genocide more than how you look, you might actually say or do something productive towards stopping it