This is exactly how meth heads act lol. Throwing around words they think about the argument and rambling.

I tagged you a while ago. Only an idiot would label me as a fascist, because you have deep misunderstanding of the word.

I do live rural so see lots of methed out people. The randomness of your reasoning and arguing with a ghost are both signs of meth use. Either that or mental health issues.

Only an idiot wouldn’t have seen drone warfare coming a decade ago. It’s sad it took you so long to figure it out.

You remind me of the guy that I bought a boat outdrive from. Several months later he threatened to shoot me if I didn’t forget his address. He didn’t know where i lived but randomly responded to me. Meth head behavior.

It’s funny as hell that I live rent-free in your head.

It’s not even hard to look this up, or maybe I already have the context having loved the 90s history channel. Vietnam had majority support for the first few years. But it was one of the first conflicts that was widely televised. Americans had never so quickly seen how fucked up war was, so support dropped off quickly. Weapons were also becoming a lot more fucked up during this time as well, adding to the visual horror.

I guess they and some is complicated for you, dumbass.

I never claimed they should banned, you fucking idiot. You are arguing against an imaginary person. Easy access to guns is objectively stupid.

It’s likely not ok. But focusing on every source of carcinogen in your life won’t stop you from getting cancer eventually. Eating healthy and using Teflon pans will probably give you a better life than eating like shit on cast iron. No real way to know the future though.

Tritan is a good example of this hyper focus on not consuming bad stuff. It has 3 components, 2 of which imitate estrogen. It’s the plastic that replaced polycarbonate. Which is derived from BPA, but in reality contains very little after you wash it once.

I keep wondering when you will ask what i mean by easy access to guns. Dumb people always take several steps back into their beliefs before fighting back.

Yes. Fascists don’t need to seize guns and have a complicated relationship with them. Nazi Germany is the easiest example. Gun ownership for true Germans and completely disallowed for ‘the other’. It does vary though, which is part of the difficulty in defining fascism and identifying fascists.

I’d argue you are more of a debate lord. Telling me you won’t respond, then making more false stupid statements.

Gun people have sanitized history to support improved sales in the past. Its completely accepted these days that removing guns from a population under fascism is required.

Expanding the argument doesn’t disagree with my point, easy access to guns is stupid. Never disagreed with mental health or education. Stupid people tend to imagine who they are arguing against, which is why you imagined i disagreed with you on those points.

Fascism does sometimes include siezing of guns. But it’s not a required component. The talking point about guns saving us from Fascism is a sales pitch from the 50s and 60s. Guns don’t save anyone from Fascism. It does drive sales up though.

Keep talking past the point all you want, i guess. Doesn’t make anything you say more correct.

Banning some guns is part of regulation, unless you don’t understand how regulation works.

My ‘wut’ is about you fundamentally misunderstanding how regulation works. I’m not allowed to drive a semi because I don’t have a class A license. Just like I shouldn’t own an AR-15 to control the local deer population.

Wut?

Hah, thank you. Feel like I’m arguing with some who lacks the ability to understand nuanced argument. Its OK to be wrong or disagree on a topic without being 100% right or wrong is a lesson that seems to be disappearing these days.

I dont want firearms to be removed, beyond restricting access. Including logical fallacies is how I single out people with weak ideologies. Weak beliefs always lean on logical fallacies when challenged.

Move the goalposts again if you wish. Individual harm caused by thermite is relatively limited, even in a war like setting. Lighting a forest on fire doesn’t require thermite. Unless you’re a fuckin idiot or in middle school

The current administration is too inept to effectively remove firearms. Fascism has always existed in the US, but its more obvious today than in 1940. We don’t win by clinging to guns and pretending they will provide retribution.

I won’t elaborate on the very basic knowledge I have of explosives because you seem to think knowing about thermite makes you threatening lol.

Falacy falacy is why i include small insults. Leaning on a fallacy is what stupid people do when they don’t have anything to stand on.

Just checking the thread… but holy fuck you are weirdly obsessed with drones and thermite. I responded to you elsewhere and I want to make it more clear. I have the education and skills required to design and build the things you are acting like you know about. Even though I have the credentials, I hate flexing them in this capacity.

You are sort of useless from a short reading of your comments. Bring something to the table before arguing about things you don’t understand.