That behavior deserves more internet points

I don’t use Teams but I use WebEx on a Linux laptop. Can’t imagine how it can get worse than that

Did you also like Parks and Recs?

Judging someone by what their great grandfather did or who he supported is so reductive it makes your point worthless.

Thanks. I hate politically correct language like this

Sorry but what’s a MAP?

I knew the guy was an alien!

Depends on what frequency your “mirror” mirrors.

A traditional one reflects higher frequency of electromagnetic rays (visible light) than what you need for wifi (in the microwave frequencies)

The comment you are replying to is probably more about finding a balance between comfort and luxury than an exact guide on what limit to apply to your spending. At least that’s how I take it.

USB sticks are not very reliable and can become totally unreadable randomly. I hope you at least have a few backups of it

Don’t know the answer to your question but wanted to support the question anyway. I don’t get why you’re being downvoted

USA: die or get crippled by debt for getting saved

No, arch doesn’t need GCC. Maybe Gentoo. But this smells like a troll anyway

That’s actually the factual way to describe it

I think what is missing is control over the representatives. When you elect someone, you give them your power, you should be able to take it back when they abuse it.

In a representative democracy, transparency and control are key and when this is not enforced, people tend to think the system is broken and does not work. It would work if that is fixed

If you want cheap qualified labor in the US you’re gonna have to put more white people in prison

How does that solve the bandwidth issue?

The article doesn’t say if they intend to have 100% nuclear or if they dropped the target of 100% renewable to have a mix with more nuclear

Honest questions:

1. Are there allegations as strong against them (the white judges)?

2. Who would benefit from the hate/racial crime against the black judge? (Certainly not the rich friends who are probably white)

What strikes me is that you don’t even seem to care that there’s an ethical and moral dilemma of having a court justice being offered multi million gifts from billionaires. You only argue that people attack him based on his skin color.

So you think people (of color or not) that hold high power in the US judicial system should be able to enjoy the benefits of having rich friends and it should not be a concern to anyone? They should be held accountable for it?