Well, I hear the wind talk and appreciate the discussion. I think in broaching a topic like climate change and especially how it relates to established social systems and norms, it takes all kinds. There is definitely an incentive you describe that is perverse when it’s just for money, but when it comes to getting a message out there, I think most well-meaning people just realize they have to play the game. Everything in in the digital age is always is jockying for leverage in the attention economy, and if what your putting out is something you really care about, you want it to have an impact. I definitely agree the approach can be counterproductive, but it’s up the creator in the end. And, other less genuine, reactionary, and shallow exchanges in this post’s comment section aside, at least in this particular case it led to something good.

Hop on over to c/breadtube and contribute more if you find these kinds of topics interesting. I’m hoping that while Lemmy is small, we can get something decent cultivated. Much appreciated :)

@Fisk400@feddit.nu

if you want to watch this, keep in mind that it’s made by a tankie.

What do you mean by this? Could you kindly explain what that term means to you, and why it is relevant to this discourse?

(I use this reply format to prevent my replies from being removed if/when the comment that I’m replying to is deleted by the creator.)

I agree that the creator may have chosen a title that could potentially be counterproductive, but it was certainly an intentional move. At least it led to some discussion on an issue that frankly doesn’t have much awareness is the generl public. “Shock value” is a strategy where creators intentionally use provocative or controversial imagery, titles, or content to elicit strong emotional reactions from their audience. This can be done to grab attention, spark discussions, and raise awareness about a particular issue, idea, or message. The goal is to make the audience think and engage with the content more deeply due to the intense emotional response it evokes. In this case, it worked pretty well, considering many videos posted have almost no discussion at all in the comments.

Edit: spelling

@Holyginz@lemmy.world

Blaming men or women is beyond dumb. It’s greedy corporations and corrupt politicians. Videos like this only distract people

The video doesn’t blame men or women. It analyzes and criticizes the power structure that excacerbates serious issues and hinders us from making positive change happen.

(I use this reply format to prevent my replies from being removed if/when the comment that I’m replying to is deleted by the creator.)

@Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works

I think the important thing is that we are divided along arbitrary lines, pitted needlessly against each other and thereby paralysed and unable to push for the necessary policy changes.

The video title is meant to be inflammatory to get people to watch it. Criticizing patriarchy is not attacking men or dividing groups. In fact, it does the exact opposite, resisting the power dynamics that stratify and divide groups and prevent us from working together to achieve change.

(I use this reply format to prevent my replies from being removed if/when the comment that I’m replying to is deleted by the creator.) Edit: typos

Is that a setting somewhere? Because that is not how it behaves on my end. Deleting a comment hides all replies.

No, I don’t want to delete others comments. I want others’ comments to not be deleted when the original commentor deletes the original comment that starts a comment thread.

This is what I want. How can I get this?

This was the reason for this post. It has happened to me quite a few times already. When I take a bunch of time to make a well-thought-out reply and link a bunch of references in a discussion, I don’t want all that effort to effectively disappear when the original commentor just decides they are embarrassed or don’t want to continue and just nukes the thread.

Edit: typos

I would be happier if figures like him weren’t influential as well.

Providing counter-narratives based in truth of chauvinists or toxic figures in general can provide a path for those, especially younger viewers, to find a way out of the pipeline. It’s the whole idea of hijacking the algorithm that has been and is used to deconvert impressionable young men from alt-right, red pill, or manosphere online communities.

It’s interesting that the one posted later has more engagement.

Right, @doggle@lemmy.world said it better than I, thanks. And yeah, @kugel7c@feddit.de, pretty much.

Not necessarily. Content could be related to philosophy, history, economics, art, literature, or other fields of discourse.

It is a community for sharing and discussion of any left video content and ideas. So, if you can make or find content with a left perspective that focuses on bread, sure! But the name is actually in reference to left author Peter Kropotkin’s The Conquest of Bread. But, I mean, bread is good, too.

Their heads, if we play our cards right.

anything

Workers taking smoke breaks is fine. Anything that gives workers more breaks is good. You can takethose breaks too. Just tell them its a smoke break. If management says anything, tell them you have just as much need for it as anyone who smokes. Don’t get mad at your fellow workers. Get mad at the employer.

I’d love to tell you all about why I missed 20 years of work, but I’m at the beach right now.