Because one day you might become pope, and it’s all people will talk about?

It’s the corporate way of saying “we’re too lazy/cheap to fix any bug, so please lower your standards.”

Ahh yes sorry, just had my lunch weed break.

Without the picture I would have taken it a completely different way!

It started with billionaires buying up all the media, but was further accelerated by the algorithms.

this isn’t how we want to operate, but it’s hard to perfectly predict growth surges that lead to GPU shortages."

That’s very ironic coming from you guys!

(Who develop prediciton models)

Doofus Operating Goverent Entity

Dicks Organising Gorvernment’s End

Don’t Overexplain, Greed Everywhere

People who like China are more likely to download tiktok. I don’t read anything comparing users to before they started using tiktok…

https://techcrunch.com/2025/01/05/openai-is-losing-money-on-its-pricey-chatgpt-pro-plan-ceo-sam-altman-says/

Not sure if it’s the case for all subscriptions though.

It depends. Is it wrong to abort a child with mild autism? (Assuming we could test for that)

I’d say very much so. (assuming the child was otherwise wanted)

But if it’s a disability where they (or people around them) were to live a life full of (mental) pain it would be a different story.

So there is a line somewhere. But drawing a line between “desirables” and “undesirables” is frowned upon.

The links from the github in case anyone wants to learn more (in order of the list):

https://web.archive.org/web/20210901023138/https://mstdn.social/@feditips/106835057054633379

https://raddle.me/f/lobby/96713/heads-up-the-tankie-behind-lemmy-ml-got-banned-from-r

https://raddle.me/f/lobby/155371/warning-lemmy-doesn-t-care-about-your-privacy-everything-is

What would you say if some kind alien drags you out of your house, puts you in a cage, into a vehicle that you can’t even comprehend?

Love to see it!

And if you’re having that much trouble with regular software, imagine how it would go with a model, which even capable programmers don’t (always) fully understand…

Anyone who has ever touched their software knows how this will go…

It’s not just new York times. All our national news sources did the same. And since it happened here they should know better. Needless to say, it has been a huge eye opener… And guess what, they even asked: “is this terrorism?”

If you need a scapegoat, you pick one that can’t defend itself as easy.

Infinite growth meets finite world.

They don’t do that in my country.

You get a stone with a number carved in it beforehand. You put the stone with the deceased body. Afterwards that stone is in the urn.

Edit: bonus fact, if the person was heavy, their ashes will be too.