You mean to say that some people who write history are biased. History itself does not hold agency.

History isn’t a living thing, it’s a concept. People within history may be biased, however.

You’d have a lot of people erasing their trauma and then not understanding why they do or feel a certain way about things.

There’s an entire field of study called “History” and people are trained to do just that. YOU, specifically, want otherwise. Don’t project that on other people.

Bonus points if they open Spotlight and type “CMD”.

All things that suck and are part of human nature. Sadly most people seem unable to grow past their primal urges.

Where did you gather that I’m ok with that? What a strange comment. One can view history through a neutral lens.

Honestly, though, this has happened throughout all of human civilization. It’s only now that people think it’s generally a bad thing. In the past, you either didn’t care, suffered it, or celebrated the conquest.

Actually it’s one of the more stable things out there. It resists economic issues.

It’s what happens when narcissists get into power.

What does the UK export that they could leverage here?

Thanks for that input. I might look into something.

How difficult was this to do?

Do people genuinely rely on these or are they really just a novelty?

This story is specifically non-gendered but people keep assuming that OP is male and partner is female.

Sir is not a grammatical person. You/Thou are, however. That’s the difference.

Technically English has this too but it’s not used outside of extremely formal situations. You = formal, Thou = informal.

I agree. Even when it was new and I went “wow look where the technology has gone!” I still felt that it was insufficient and would age. Honestly the movies are fantastic until they try to show giant orc armies and then it’s a bit MEH.

probably the best simpsons quote ever

Anything before the year 2000 is old. Ask any Gen Z/Alpha.