

is your roomba loosing its parts? looks like a roomba brush


is your roomba loosing its parts? looks like a roomba brush


I think pigs and bears are pretty closely related.


Rule 2 is a little gray but if the title reads like a catchy headline, then it’s probably not a complete thought. Another way to think about it, the title should make you want to read more because it’s a good thought, not because it a cliff hanger.
OP, would you mind updating the title with a little more context?
For example if you added “because they are providing training data” to the title. It would seem more like a complete thought to me.


Poland ball makes videos?! I always thought they were just images.


I try to be objective where I can but all of the rules have gray area so I try to err on the side of not taking things down. Little nudges from the community, like your comment here, help to shape the community so thanks for being an engaged member!


I see there are many variations of this joke.


As a mod, I thank you sincerely for your judgement.


I see no reason that professionals shouldn’t be allowed to make money off of their profession. There are some opportunities for some perverse incentives in any industry, but that’s why licensing and ethics boards exist.


It’s easy to turn a blind eye when things are going well in your personal life. It’s the central theme of “They Thought They Were Free: The Germans 1933-45”


A reminder that Rule 3 is no politics. Obviously there is grey area in the rule. This post avoids being rage bait and no one has reported it yet.


If you define ‘need’ very loosely then the statement becomes pretty meaningless but I agree with it.
Otherwise there are many scenarios where I disagree with it.
There is lots of valuable talking that happens that doesn’t strictly need to be said.
Small talk is important for relationships.
Anyone learning a language needs to talk a lot just for the sake of talking. Even if nothing needs to be said.
Sometimes people need to be and feel heard to feel welcome in a group. It’s easy to say that the content of the conversation isn’t nearly as important as the act of having the conversation.


This post was reported. I agree it can come across as a bit agressive and arrogant.
I think the other commenters are doing a good job of pointing out the many perspectives on this post so I won’t take action for now.


Cool peertube !
… at least that was one of the rules we played by


Maybe this is a dumb question but what does a sock processing facility do?


Walking out is nice. More action is needed.


Yeah, AI is kinda like the monkey’s paw.


Your comment was in a different thread. I did remove your comment. I didn’t nuke that thread.


I did that. The top comment was a troll and the thread was feeding the troll and people were reporting each other. Here is the modlog for the top comment.
Removed Comment: Since this is lemmy nobody can disagree with this opinion or post stats that discredit it without a ban.
reason: This is trolling. You are welcome to make claims and cite sources. This thread did neither of those. It was just bickering. Here is an example of claims with sources https://lemmy.world/comment/19389340
^ This was reported for being a troll. I think the reporter is correct. Even the original post is a bit of a troll for the average Lemmy person.
If you choose to reply to this comment, careful not to feed the trolls.