I think the benefit of third party AI services is exactly a way around that limited context window. The service can summarize the previous conversations and key facts about the user, store it and feed that back into the AI prompt.

Instead of wasting most of the context window for pages and pages of conversation, it can just prompt the AI with something like “the user is called Timmy, he works as an accountant, he has a girlfriend called Tammy, yesterday he told you that he thinks about proposing.”.

I think even ChatGPT does something like that, but as it’s a very general tool it might not be the best in filtering out information that is relevant for a “personal” conversation.

Yeah that is absurd. I’ve found exactly one comment that is at least not negative.

Thanks! No idea why we’d have to fake the photo if the original is pretty meme-y already

If a website with old-school passwords gets hacked, the hacker only gets salted hashes of passwords - this does not seem to be much worse?

(Websites that store plaintext passwords surely won’t implement passkeys either…)

Why aren’t more people questioning this

And yet this thread is full of comments both confidently and cynically proclaiming that it’s totally useless and only there for the lawyers yada yada

Even Tesla themselves calls the removed sensors “radar” so I don’t think your rude dismissal of GPs post is appropriate.

In 2021, we began our transition to Tesla Vision by removing radar from Model 3 and Model

https://www.tesla.com/support/transitioning-tesla-vision

I think OP made it pretty clear it’s a hypothetical question

It already happened for a brief period of time many years ago

There are/were already TVs that automatically connect to any public WiFi or even have their own SIM card.

I’m buying a new (programmable) keyboard for the sole purpose of remapping capslock to backspace. Been using that for years and now my new employer forces me to use Windows where this isn’t possible without Avon rights - it drives me insane how often I end up LIKE THIS;

Great. Making generalizing statements based on ONE case from over 10 years ago, which was - at best - debatable (see other response).

deleted by creator

An interesting bit of information without any sources at all…

Good for you, so you’re from the EU or any other country that forces MS to stop this bullshit (or at least your installations believe you are).

*DMCA

If done right, the “what it does” is in the method name. If your method is too complicated to summarize in its name, chances are good you should split it up or extract parts of it.

W3C lists 1138 separate standards currently, so if each of their three engineers implements one discrete standard every day, with no breaks/weekends/holidays, then having an alpha available that adheres to all 2024 web standards should be possible by 2026?

Yes, that is exactly the plan: “We are targeting Summer 2026 for a first Alpha version”

Amazing, I’ve missed that 🤦

That seems like an overly tedious way of entering your preferences. Why can’t I just rank a handful of factors (cheap housing, beaches, climate, politics, diversity) and give them some weight?

You could even make the ranking of the factors in the current style (“snowy winters are [much] more important than beaches”). That would reduce the cognitive load of comparing 3 vs 3 properties many times in a row.