Absolutely. Capitalism enforces a different heirarchy where power resides with owners. The owners then suppress the power of the workers.
Can we do better? I hope so.
Absolutely. Capitalism enforces a different heirarchy where power resides with owners. The owners then suppress the power of the workers.
Can we do better? I hope so.
I want to own the value I produce. Currently I sell my time to an owner. The value I produce through my work is sold by the owner. Any excess after costs goes to the owner. The owner did not work to produce the value.
Why should owners be supported by the excess value produced by workers?
If I spent the time to dump the human boss off my back, I would not turn around and give that power to a computer. Worker controlled labor puts the power in workers’ hands.
Computers can help with communication of needs, but power should stay with workers.
Star Trek is an example of a post scarcity society. I worry about persisting military rank instead of a horizontal power structure.
You caught me. I’m old, write software and regularly use Linux.
I am pro gun and pro choice. I agree it is hard to pick a candidate. Where are the anarchist candidates?
Not American Libertarian. The trust of corporations to not be a government with more steps is nonsense. Giving Disney a monopoly on violence is a bad idea.
A federated direct democracy with any delegation of power coming from the bottom. Supporters reserve the power to fire the delegate. Delegation of power should be allowed to rotate through the federation providing each member with experience.
Anyone can propose rules. Decisions are made via direct democracy scoped to effected parties. The goal of any decision is consensus.
Efficiency will be an issue since consensus and direct democracy require input from more people. Tools can help alleviate inefficiencies. Computers and artificial intelligence are examples of such tools. Voters would choose which tools to use.