• kalleboo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    I have symmetrical 10 Gbps at home ($30/mo) and I’ll agree. When it’s nice when you have big updates, for most households 1 Gbps is going to be just fine. As you say, the vast majority of users are bottlenecked by Wi-Fi.

    The bigger crime are all the asymmetrical connections that people on technologies like Cable TV networks have, where you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up. This results in crappy video calls, makes off-site/remote backups unfeasible, means you can’t host anything at home, etc.

    • imouto@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 days ago

      you get 1-2 Gbps down but only something tiny like 50 Mbps up

      That’s exactly what you get in Australia, even if you have FTTP, 95% of ISPs only offer up to 1000/50Mbps, and that’s if you live in the big cities. Mine costs ~US$70/mo btw. And they have a ‘typical evening speed’ that drops to 860/42Mbps (I’ve never heard of such a concept outside Australia. Yeah, totally not a scam).

      A handful ISPs offer 1000/400Mbps and you’ll be looking at ~US$125/mo. Anything faster you’ll be handed with astronomical commercial bills.

    • ftbd@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      Do you actually have 10G switches and network cards, or is everything behind your router on 1G?

      • kalleboo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        15 days ago

        I have a cheap noname chinese switch with 2x10gbit ports and 4x2.5 Gbps ports, so I have the 10 Gbit ports to the internet and my computer, and use a 2.5 gbps port for my NAS, everything else is 1 gbit