• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    The hell? There’s no reason to use plain HTTP instead of HTTPS.

    And symmetric encryption is wildly irresponsible as well.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Not for s second do I believe this was a accidental oversight.

      I am sure they had very good reasons, all alligned with their actual interests with no thought spared to even consider consequences for small fish users.

      • kinsnik@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        2 months ago

        i just can’t think of any. like the article says, i fully expected the app to send data to china. but even if you are maliciously spying on users, why would you send the stolen data on unsecured channels? so that everyone in the path takes advantage of the data your wanted to steal?

      • trolololol@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Yep I’m with you.

        It’s so easy to use https with secure encryption. It’s the default. You have to go out of your way to use s symmetric key or to even allow http without SSL in xcode or Android studio.

  • cybersin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    75
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    2 months ago

    This is dumb.

    Even if you encrypt network traffic, the receiving server still knows what you’re doing. All it does is prevent third parties from snooping.

    Usually.

    • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yes, so not only are they doing something shady, they’re doing something shady and exposing your data to anyone wanting to snoop it. What’s dumb about criticising the latter part?

      • cybersin@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        2 months ago

        The fact that anyone thinks they have any semblance of privacy when typing into an online AI chatbot is saddening.

        Of course anything you type into a externally hosted AI is going to be harvested and sold.

        But sure, in this case you are also potentially exposing your queries to your ISP or someone listening on your local network too.

        • breadsmasher@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          23
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Regardless of the downstream server, you should expect the interim traffic to be encrypted in transit

          • cybersin@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            2 months ago

            Sure, it’s not a bad thing and it should be standard practice, but to act like encrypted traffic guarantees privacy is silly.

            • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              18
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              The thing is that with the traffic unencrypted it opens the door to all sorts of attacks on that traffic.

              It’s not just privacy.

              If you can intercept and interpret you have the ability to replace as well.

              This is the integrity of your data

            • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              Tell me where in this thread are anyone expecting privacy from any online LLM service, or anyone saying encrypted traffic guarantees privacy?

    • trolololol@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 months ago

      Yep it also prevents anyone in the airport impersonating the WiFi and the bytedance server (which is trivial) and crafting payloads that run insecure code on your phone ( not that easy but there’s heaps of CVEs like this in apps like Safari over the years, so there’s at least 2x as many in an app like this)

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        That’s an understatement. It won’t even fit well in 8xA100, you need an EPYC server to run it in CPU RAM, very slowly.

        • Hackworth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          To run the 671B parameter R1, my napkin math was something like 3/4 of a million dollars in hardware. But that (plus the much lower training cost) made this a millionaire’s game rather than a billionaire’s. Plus the distillations do seem better than anything else we have at the smaller sizes at the moment. That said, I’m more looking forward to the first use of deepseek’s methods with google’s Titan architectures.

  • daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    There’s zero relationship between data being unencrypted and it being sent to chinese servers.

    If you use a chinese service it’s obvious that data is going to be sent to a chinese server and that the chinese server would be able to read it.

    Unencrypted data transfer, it’s a totally different thing. I would like to see if it’s truly unencrypted or just not using apple proprietary encryption.

    I luckily don’t own any apple product, but I have deepseek app on my android device. If I’m bored later I’ll try to intercept my own data to see if it’s truly unencrypted. This is easy to test. If it’s not true that newspaper is going to my “block list” asap.

      • misk@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        If leaking data is intentional then there are better ways than doing it in the open. Doubly so if you supposedly are in cahoots with your hosting and Chinese government.

        • gens@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          "Open"ai is definitely sharing everything you tipe with your government. Only difference is that chinese care less about your illusions. That said we are not even a blip in the sea of data so it doesn’t matter anyway.

          Bdw your patriot act says that any data that goes over your border can be stored and used indefinitely. So me seing your comment means your nsa will store it and can use it, even though spying on your own people is against your constitution or something.

          • misk@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Yeah, I’m not an American and not here to argue one’s better than the other because if you care about your data you just don’t give them opportunity to see it. I’m having fun pointing out how silly this poo-slinging between US and China looks to bystanders, that’s all. It’s like denouncing DeepSeek is a modern day swearing fealty to the American lords.

  • CallateCoyote@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Does this actually matter so long as I just ask it questions I want answers to? I’m not feeding it any personal information. Sincere question. Enlighten me if so.

    • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      Having an app installed gives it a lot of information

      Unencrypted just means people on the way to that server can peek

  • giacomo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    its nice of them not to encrypt it at least. it can get harvested along the way!