• tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    if Trump were to federalize National Guard units, there’s nothing the state could do to prevent it; a presidential order preempts state authority.

    Why would blue states fear only red state national guard if this is the case? The local guard would have to enforce the federal edicts, right?

    I guess if they don’t, the only two options are do nothing or confront the invading guard, the latter of which sounds a lot like civil war.

    • Nastybutler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 month ago

      if Trump were to federalize National Guard units, there’s nothing the state could do to prevent it; a presidential order preempts state authority.

      And yet I remember not so long ago at the Texas border where Abbott refused to have the NG stand down when Biden ordered it. So there’s precedent already there to ignore Cheeto in Charge’s orders

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 month ago

      As much as we like to assume soldiers will follow orders and doctrine as if they were computers running code…they are ultimately human beings with their own free will, reasoning, biases, and agendas, to hell with what is and isn’t legal and proper on paper. It would be a crossroads for the country and everyone who serves.

      One of the oldest rules of quelling rebellion is to not use the local soldiers to do it. Too much emotional attachment. Bring in an outside force, preferably ones with standing ethnic or political hatred for those you want to crush.