• LostWon@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    9 个月前

    Maybe if it runs longer, we all get to jump to a better timeline. 😅

    • Pumpkin Escobar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 个月前

      Or the world blows up and it’s all over. I guess what I’m saying is, no downside, fire it up and let’s see what happens.

    • Obelix@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 个月前

      I’m sceptical. Even if somebody would present a working fusion reactor today, what would the timeline to replace everything based on fossil fuels even be? Build several thousand of expensive fusion reactors in every country of the world, even in geopolitical rivals like China, Russia or North Korea or war-torn third world countries? Replace every car with an electrical one? Replace home heating everywhere? Rebuild every ship and airplane worldwide?

      • JayObey711@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 个月前

        I mean yea that’s the plan. What are the other options? Force every countrie to stop producing instead to reduce carbon emissions that way? Wich one Sounds more realistic? And I feel like you assume that fusion reactors are dangerous because your comments about war torn countries. But it’s not possible to turn them into weapons. They run on hydrogen. And if they ever oberheat or something the magnets stop working and the reaction stops.

      • LostWon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 个月前

        I was just making an abstract sci-fi joke based on how cold fusion has been presented like a Holy Grail in the past. Obviously a better source of energy isn’t going to solve all our problems, no matter how good it is.