• lmuel@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Ladybird is certainly interesting to watch, it’s improving quite quickly.

    I know people on here hate it because of one (admittedly not at all nice) gender issue in the codes comments but like… seriously?

    • gon [he]@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I know people on here hate it because of one (admittedly not at all nice) gender issue in the codes comments but like… seriously?

      I actually recently had a discussion about this very issue and came to see it as a case of poor communication, rather than anything mean-spirited on the devs’ part.

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Neither is Servo.

      Chaotic good because it’s an entire (almost functional) engine built from scratch, and without any corporate backing.

  • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    I’m not sure I have a lot of faith in Servo but we are in need of anything better than Gecko. Ladybird is the new one on the block and we will see if it goes anywhere. I like that Ladybird it’s own web browser.

    • Mwa@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Same cause nowadays you have to rely on a for profit company for your browser engine.

        • Mwa@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          true, if it was a company like suse,redhat who was for-profit and had a good browser engine then sure if its like google then maybe but for-profit companies are known to be problematic.

          • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            I think the key thing is to have checks and balances and or incentives so that a browser doesn’t become just a tool to sell stuff. For instance, I hear the Mullvad browser is pretty good. It isn’t independent for obvious reasons but the idea still applies.

          • acockworkorange@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            SuSE is problematic? As far as I know they released their system administration tools as open source without ever needing to, didn’t they? They’re for profit but seem to drive their profits on services rather selling software, as a good open source denizen. What am I missing?

    • Hellfire103@lemmy.caOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Going from lawful to chaotic, good to evil, we have:

      • Gecko (Firefox, Seamonkey, and derivatives)
      • Servo
      • Libweb (Ladybird)
      • Links2 (as well as ELinks and other forks)
      • WebKit (used in a lot of stuff, namely Safari and GNOME Web)
      • Goanna (Pale Moon and Basilisk)
      • QtWebEngine (Konqueror, Falkon, and qutebrowser)
      • Blink (Chromium, Brave, and derivatives)
      • Trident (Internet Explorer, old versions of Maxthon, old versions of Avant, and any homemade browser created with Visual Studio).
      • 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Huh, I didn’t know MSHTML as used in IE was also called Trident. I thought Trident was specifically early Edge before they switched to Blink.