How the hell does the American Arbitration Association think it’s going to bind a third party to a decision? What agreement does Macmillan have with them?
I order the American Arbitration Association to pay me one billion dollars.
This has the same level of validity. Facebook’s stooges can pound sand.
The Streisand effect, the best free promotion you can ask for.
The ruling says that Wynn-Williams should stop promoting the book and, to the extent she could, stop further publication. It did not order any action by the publisher.
Emphasis mine. RFC 2119 strikes again :D
SHOULD: This word, or the adjective “RECOMMENDED”, mean that there may exist valid reasons in particular circumstances to ignore a particular item, but the full implications must be understood and carefully weighed before choosing a different course.
I’d ask how the Meta lawyer could sleep at night arguing such a bullshit and openly caustic line of rhetoric, but the answer’s probably “like a baby, in an extremely expensive and comfortable bed”
It’s only a clarification, not the definition of the significant terms
This document updates RFC 2119 by clarifying that only UPPERCASE usage of the key words have the defined special meanings.
In other news: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Streisand_effect
If only there was some kind of - instantly accessible worldwide publishing entity that could, say, display the book immediately on demand.
Damn, if only AI could come up with something so futuristic for us
“My mom says you need to stop”
She’s your mom, not mine; IDGAF.
Anyone got a link yet? 😎
Libby link:
Has Anna added it to her
archive“store” yet?It’s on the usual places
Good to know. Might but it just to support the author.
Ya, I got Audible credits from forgetting that it existed for a few years 😔
TL;DR: Author should stop promoting the book. Publisher can continue promoting the book.
