• Armok_the_bunny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    64
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    Nope, it was so they could take the 30% cut of every penny that is spent on one of their platforms, and also so that it would be extremely inconvenient to leave their ecosystem since doing so would mean leaving behind most of your data.

    • emogu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      28
      ·
      9 days ago

      It’s both of those things. Just like Sony, Xbox, Nintendo, Steam, etc. They take 30% in exchange for exposure, security, and a reliable platform. It’s a trade off. Worth it to some, not to others.

      • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Of those steam is the only one that doesn’t force you to buy software through them on their own hardware. Obviously they would like you to, but you are free to buy elsewhere.

          • Korhaka@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 days ago

            Are you able to buy a game on an xbox without paying a cut to microsoft? Because you can buy a game on steamdeck without giving valve a cut. Though I suspect the vast majority don’t because valve actually work for their cut given the tools they have made to help games run on the hardware even if the game wasn’t built for it.