• Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    That is weird to me because Jesus repeatedly condemned the rich. He even violently kicked them out of temples by whipping them and flipping tables. Jesus even said the wealthy will never enter into heaven. Jesus was essentially a proto-communist

    • Saleh@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Jesus also didn’t proclaim himself to be the literal son of God, nor a part of God. That was invented by the churches some 300 years later. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea

      Both Judaism and Christianity had their scriptures altered over time, serving political goals of the scholar’s class. This is why Islam puts such a strong focus preserving the Quran exactly as it was revealed.

      • Zxq@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        Can you please expound upon that point, re: Jesus didn’t proclaim himself to be the literal son of God. Never heard that before.

        • Saleh@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          Sure. So in Islam we believe that God and the creation are seperate. All Prophets (peace be upon them) are humans, who have been given prophethood for their virtuous character. Any powers outside the realm of human capacities were granted by God to aid their mission, but it wasn’t their inherent powers.

          For a longer read on this from an Islamic perspective i found this article: https://www.reviewofreligions.org/27744/jesus-son-of-god-historical-context-long-read/

          As for the development of the Christian idea that Jesus would be the son of God. This is a Greek/Roman idea that was pushed to dominance around the fourth century. Notable is the Council of Nicae, where it was agreed that the concept of Trinity (with Jesus as son of God and some abstract holy spirit) should be the used. As for the reason why, it is likely that the Trinity was chosen to make Christianity more palatable to Polytheists, despite the rejection of polytheism and embrace of monotheism being fundamental to the Abrahamic religions. This is also why the concept is strongly rejected by Jews and Muslims. However also Nontrinitarian Christians exist to this day.

          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Council_of_Nicaea#Outcomes
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nontrinitarian#History

          • Zxq@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            3 days ago

            That’s an interesting take. Having been raised Christian, but now mostly agnostic, it’s a view I had not heard before. Thanks for sharing this.

    • ThomasCrappersGhost@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      I agree. I look at it this way…how many of those that claim to be Christian actually have Christian values or live by the Ten Commandments?

      • betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 days ago

        …how many […] actually have Christian values…

        All of them, it’s how you know what “Christian values” really are (not just the cleaned-up public-facing image they use for marketing) and it turns out they’re pretty shit.

    • CalipherJones@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Many Christians have never read the Bible. They hear about eternal salvation so long as you dunk in some water and say you’re sorry and they’re sold. If they even consciously think about it in the first place.

      Christianity is just another one of Plato’s caves