Summary

Trump warned automakers not to raise prices after announcing a 25% tariff on imported vehicles starting April 3, claiming the tariffs would be “great” and benefit U.S. manufacturing.

Industry leaders, including GM, Ford, and Stellantis CEOs, expressed concerns about inevitable price increases, with experts warning tariffs could add thousands to car costs.

Auto suppliers stated that absorbing tariffs is impossible, and dealers fear affordability challenges for consumers.

While the United Auto Workers union support the move as a job creator, trade groups predict higher prices and fewer manufacturing jobs.

  • novibe@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    4 days ago

    Cool little story and all, but Canada is the furthest thing away from socialist.

    Socialism is not when the government does stuff. And the more stuff it does, it doesn’t get more socialist. Even if it does A LOT of stuff, it still won’t be communism.

    Socialism/communism is the method and path through which the working class will liberate itself. It’s the death of classes and class struggle through the dictatorship of the proletariat.

    • futatorius@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      More precisely, to use Marx’s definition: socialism is when workers own and fully control the means of production.

      Government services: not socialism, no worker ownership or control.

      State capitalism (like China and the former USSR): not socialism, no worker ownership or control.

      Historically, the closest things we’ve seen to socialism so far are worker-owned co-operatives and city- or provincial-level anarcho-syndicalist systems such as the Spanish Anarchists before the fascists murdered them. Some grassroots movements like Podemos and Occupy have also attempted to implement such systems, with brief and limited success.

      Again going back to Marx, he expected socialism to be an emergent phenomenon as late capitalism in the most advanced economies becomes unsustainable (he didn’t anticipate the transition from feudalism to state capitalism in Russia and China, or its leaders fraudulently calling it socialism). You’ll see more attempts to implement worker ownership and control, and you’ll see those who get fat off the existing system do everything they can to smack those attempts down. That’s where we are now. Then there will be a sort of phase transition that might take the form of a revolution or might be a less brutal change.

      Now, whether Marx and his successors are correct in his prediction, only time will tell.

    • azertyfun@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Where did you get the impression that the Marxist definition of socialism was even relevant here? Bringing philosophical jargon into colloquial conversations is basically trolling at this point since philosophical/social studies jargon often use words that have zero semantic overlap with their colloquial counterpart.

      Proselytize all you want but if you “um akshully” socialism in a colloquial conversation you will look like an unwashed cave troll at best.

    • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      You know, I really don’t care how you define the system as long as it works.

      I have been people argue about ‘socialism’ vs. ‘social democracy’ vs ‘communism’ since I was in grade school and none of it has done a drop of good for anyone whatsoever.

      While people on the Left are wasting time arguing, the people on the Right are voting. They are the ones who keep winning because they keep their eyes on the prize.

      Donald Trump is literally throwing people in jail for speaking out, and expanding the Gaza genocide right now, and you’re focusing on how I define 'socialism.

      • futatorius@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        I have been people argue about ‘socialism’ vs. ‘social democracy’ vs ‘communism’ since I was in grade school and none of it has done a drop of good for anyone whatsoever.

        If you’re unable to clearly define your terms, you’re unable to think correctly. Knowing what you’re talking about is a good in and of itself.

        the people on the Right are voting

        That voting is a downstream consequence of a long program of mass manipulation and propaganda, backed with voter-suppression measures. Unless you address that root cause, lecturing people about not voting is a pointless distraction.

        and you’re focusing on how I define 'socialism

        Making a couple posts didn’t take long, and education is part of the process. There can be no revolution without revolutionary consciousness. If you become capable of thinking more clearly, maybe you’ll someday be in a position to affect events in a more constructive way.

        • Dagwood222@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 days ago

          You know, I really don’t care how you define the system as long as it works.

          You never answered the main point.