US experts who work in artificial intelligence fields seem to have a much rosier outlook on AI than the rest of us.

In a survey comparing views of a nationally representative sample (5,410) of the general public to a sample of 1,013 AI experts, the Pew Research Center found that “experts are far more positive and enthusiastic about AI than the public” and “far more likely than Americans overall to believe AI will have a very or somewhat positive impact on the United States over the next 20 years” (56 percent vs. 17 percent). And perhaps most glaringly, 76 percent of experts believe these technologies will benefit them personally rather than harm them (15 percent).

The public does not share this confidence. Only about 11 percent of the public says that “they are more excited than concerned about the increased use of AI in daily life.” They’re much more likely (51 percent) to say they’re more concerned than excited, whereas only 15 percent of experts shared that pessimism. Unlike the majority of experts, just 24 percent of the public thinks AI will be good for them, whereas nearly half the public anticipates they will be personally harmed by AI.

  • EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    AI has it’s place, but they need to stop trying to shoehorn it into anything and everything. It’s the new “internet of things” cramming of internet connectivity into shit that doesn’t need it.

    • poopkins@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      You’re saying the addition of Copilot into MS Paint is anything short of revolutionary? You heretic.

  • Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I do as a software engineer. The fad will collapse. Software engineering hiring will increase but the pipeline of new engineers will is dry because no one wants to enter the career with companies hanging ai over everyone’s heads. Basic supply and demand says my skillset will become more valuable.

    Someone will need to clean up the ai slop. I’ve already had similar pistons where I was brought into clean up code bases that failed being outsourced.

    Ai is simply the next iteration. The problem is always the same business doesn’t know what they really want and need and have no ability to assess what has been delivered.

    • mctoasterson@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      AI can look at a bajillion examples of code and spit out its own derivative impersonation of that code.

      AI isn’t good at doing a lot of other things software engineers actually do. It isn’t very good at attending meetings, gathering requirements, managing projects, writing documentation for highly-industry-specific products and features that have never existed before, working user tickets, etc.

  • sheetzoos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    New technologies are not the issue. The problem is billionaires will fuck it up because they can’t control their insatiable fucking greed.

  • CancerMancer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Just about every major advance in technology like this enhanced the power of the capitalists who owned it and took power away from the workers who were displaced.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Its just going to help industry provide inferior services and make more profit. Like AI doctors.

  • Naevermix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    They’re right. What happens to the workers when they’re no longer required? The horses faced a similar issue at the advent of the combustion engine. The solution? Considerably fewer horses.

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I think AI will be useful, but like any nascent technology, it will have to be accessible for the public before the everyman would adopt it. IMO, we are currently at the 2nd or 3rd stage in the picture below.

  • Suite404@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    It should. We should have radically different lives today because of technology. But greed keeps us in the shit.

  • 3DMVR@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    New cascadeur update just killed inbetweenjng jobs if its as good as the trailer, but uh I think this is a case where ai good, like yeah jobs lost but the time saved is wild for indie animators

  • Sam_Bass@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    So far AI has only aggravated me by interrupting my own online activities.