• LouSlash@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        10 days ago

        Some time ago i checked some polish stores to compare W11 vs Linux / no OS prices and i found out that the difference isn’t flat and it’s actually about ~10% of product price (so the more expensive the notebook is - the higher the price of W11 is)

      • LeninOnAPrayer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        33
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        When https://massgrave.dev/ exists it’s even worse.

        I think this tax on tech illiterate people is getting too high.

        Should I start selling USB drives for $5? I don’t wanna encourage Windows. But I feel bad for the normies. $211 is insane.

        MS literally allows massgrav on GitHub. They have for years. They do not give a fuck.

        Paying for windows at this point is a normie tax. And it’s gotten too damn high!

    • limerod@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 days ago

      Wait, I had to do a double take. I thought they were charging $200 extra for Fedora and Ubuntu. They could consider sending some money to those distros for development which would still be cheaper than buying windows.

    • Ulrich@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 days ago

      I hope more OEMs start showing the price like this during configuration. People would probably think A LOT harder about using Windows if they were offered a $200 discount for trying something else…

  • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 days ago

    $211?!

    Surely that can’t be US dollars, that’d be wild. The 24-hour clock also has me thinking this isn’t the US.

    Looking at the UK site, I’d 100% go for “No Operating System”, then install Fedora Workstation anyway.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        10 days ago

        I know. It effectively means you pay $211 for Windows

        Which is is such a high dollar count that this simply cannot be USD, a theory further corroborated by the time being 24-hour format, which is uncommon in the US.

        I was simply curious to what type of dollar it is in the image. Australian, New Zealand, Canadian, something else?

        • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 days ago

          Which is is such a high dollar count that this simply cannot be USD

          So I haven’t used Windows on my own machines in about 20 years, but back when I built my own PCs that seemed about right. So I looked up the price history, didn’t realize that Microsoft reduced the license prices around Windows 8.

          I remember 20 years ago, Windows XP Home was $199 and Professional was $299 for a new license on a new computer. Vista and 7 were similarly priced.

          Since Windows 8, though, I just don’t understand their pricing or licensing terms.

        • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 days ago

          24-hour time is equally uncommon in Australia and New Zealand, but it looks like it could be one of them based on the currency conversion, could also be Singapore though, which has Dollars very close in value to those

        • letzlo@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 days ago

          I’m not that surprised. I believe it costs less on itself but there might be a surcharge for installation.

  • dryfter@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    9 days ago

    It looks like (at least here in the U.S.) that this is the only model that allows selection of the OS. I looked at cheaper models of different product lines by them and they all include Windows 11.

    I don’t understand why companies don’t offer more Linux options these days, there’s zero excuse

    • Demdaru@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Instal Windows everywhere and get cheaper Windows.

      Offer Linux and lose the offer from MS.

      So, offering linux was bad for business. Was. Bevause thanks to work communities did in Linux and marketing from Steam…and Proton, Linux stopped beimg a thing you’ll easily lose clients over.

    • Aux@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Because no one buys Linux PCs. Dell used to sell multiple lines of laptops with Linux, but pretty much no one was buying apart from a few freaks.

  • Enceladus [She/Hir]@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    9 days ago

    Awesome, I wish more computer manufacturers did this and actually gave you the ability to choose the OS to ship your PC with, especially with how much cheaper it is to not include Windows with activation. Wow.

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Exactly. I currently have a notebook which is very well made. But it still sucks that I had to pay the windows license which is of no use : (

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    Is this a tariff thing? Like is it suddenly more expensive to license Windows, hence pushing OEMs to offer discount options?

    Lenovo is at least partially Chinese.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    9 days ago

    Wow. $211 is a steep discount. People are going to buy with Linux just to save money, some will try it (because it is there), and some may like it and stay.

    At the very least, people may learn that Windows is no easier to install (or even harder).

    • serenissi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      Windows is no easier to install (or even harder).

      I’ve installed both recent windows and common distros many times by hand (where unattended wasn’t trivial) and found everything except latest windows 11 quite similar (including arch) and very easy. Current windows 11 afaik needs registry hacks but I’ve not installed one yet.

    • dustyData@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 days ago

      Depends on the country the computer is being sold in. Microsoft has different pricing structures per country and the OEM selling the computer pays down the line based on sales numbers. That’s the main way MS Windows makes money. The price of Windows has always been part of the computer’s price. It’s a tiny minority of users who pay directly to MS for a windows license. Even businesses prefer the computer to come preinstalled with the OS.

      No, you don’t get a cheaper computer if windows is cheaper in your country, final numbers are decided at the accounting level, not the point of sale. But, if they don’t have to pay MS anything, they can offer a cheaper laptop for you, the end user.

  • lemmydividebyzero@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 days ago

    I like this picture.

    It’s the usual upscaling method, but in this case, there is a way to get the price down from the default…

  • anothermember@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I thought they’d done this for years (on certain Thinkpads anyway)? Still I’d rather install my own than trust Lenovo to install it for me.

    • bufke@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      Yes they have. They are a bit inconsistent on what’s available, sometimes no linux version at all. The x1 gen 13 doesn’t offer it last I checked.

    • vrojak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      You’d still be able to just reinstall Linux, and save money in the process. And simply having the option available will probably help get Linux to some users that aren’t overly tech savvy