Hello everyone,

Opening this thread as a kind of follow-up on my thread yesterday about the drop in monthly active users on !fediverse@lemmy.ml.

As I pointed in the thread, I personally think that having some consolidated core communities would be a better solution for content discovery, information being posted only once, and overall community activity.

One of the examples of the issue of having two (or more) exactly similar Fediverse communities (!fediverse@lemmy.world and !fediverse@lemmy.ml ) is that is leads to

  • people having to subscribe to both to see the content
  • posters having to crosspost to both
  • comment being spread across the crossposts instead of having all of the discussion and reactions happening in the same place.

I am very well aware of the decentralized aspect of Lemmy being one of its core features, but it seems that it can be detrimental when the co-existing communities are exactly the same.

We are talking about different news seen from the US or Europe, or a piece of news discussed in places with different political orientations.

The two Fediverse communities look identical, there is no specific editorial line. The difference in the audience is due to the federation decisions of the instances, but that’s pretty much it, and as the topic of the community is the Fediverse itself, the community should probably be the one accessible from most of the Fediverse users.

What do you think?

Also, as a reminder, please be respectful in the comments, it’s either one of the rules of the community or the instance. Disagreeing is fine, but no need to be disrespectful.

  • severien@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I think the mods of the duplicate communities should join forces, agree on uniting the communities and close all but one (the other pointing to the united one).

    I don’t think there’s really a good reason to keep communities split. (there are of course contingencies where it makes sense, like rogue mods etc.)

    • Spzi@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think there’s really a good reason to keep communities split.

      The federated nature of the fediverse with all it’s implications.

      An instance hosting a community might

      • become unstable
      • disappear forever
      • defederate or become defederated from/by my instance
      • same for the instances of other users of that community

      Communities can have the same topic, but differ in

      • moderation style
      • policies regarding if and how bots are allowed

      I think it’s good to have some redundancy both as a backup and to have some choice. As with all things fediverse, we don’t need to find a consensus. Those who like to have one big instance or community can join the biggest. Those who prefer some diversity can spread out and create duplicates. Reality will most likely always be something in between.


      Another approach could be to ask: Why are communities split? If you’re right and there’s really no good reason, then how comes this phenomenon occurs so often? Maybe the prevalence of the phenomenon hints at reasons which exist, but are not well understood.

      • severien@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        An instance hosting a community might

        become unstable
        disappear forever
        defederate or become defederated from/by my instance
        same for the instances of other users of that community
        

        I kind of get this, but:

        • it seems premature to split the community “just in case”
        • this is largely a technical problem. IMHO communities should be federated in the sense that losing the instance shouldn’t automatically mean the community is lost.

        Communities can have the same topic, but differ in moderation style policies regarding if and how bots are allowed

        Also possible, but in most cases a large majority of community members can certainly agree on some compromise.

        Why are communities split? If you’re right and there’s really no good reason, then how comes this phenomenon occurs so often?

        • the lack of community federation
        • “my instance is better than yours” - which IMHO originates again from the lack of community federation
        • some mods just like the unrestricted power over their fiefdom
    • droans@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yep. Make it so the mods choose to “federate” with the other communities. Otherwise you might have something like news@america.site and news@europe.site which would merge despite having two different purposes.

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s part of the fediverse. It will be a obstacle for communities that will keep them from getting Reddit sized but decentralized means they aren’t supposed to get too big. I think the best compromise would be allowing you to create multi-communities on the front end or in the client.

    But end users may not want to federate with Lemmy.world or Lemmy.ml or overzealous moderators may ban a user on one instance and for that reason I’m not in favor of consolidating communities. I’d rather both grow organically

    • C4d@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think there’s an element of “careful what you wish for” (hence my stance of “let it be”). I think the risks of over-zealous behaviour, defederation and apparently spontaneous loss of host servers is quite real.

      Your idea of multi-communities seems sound; as long as the user is made aware of which community they are posting to when they reply (in case of quirks in the community rules etc) it should work - and over time it is likely that certain communities will become the “go to” for certain types of discussion.

  • ramble81@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    As someone else mentioned, this sounds like your FOMO on your reasoning. But more than that, having a single instance would actually hit less people ultimately. What happens if the combined community is on an instance that is defederated from others? The other people won’t get or see the message. What would the alternative be? To force defederated instances to get combined communities? At that point you’re breaking the underlying nature of the Fediverse.

  • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    people having to subscribe to both to see the content

    Not a problem. Just subscribe to both. It’s no big deal.

    posters having to crosspost to both

    Don’t do this! The above “issue” already solves this. If I want to see posts from both communities, I’ll subscribe to both communities. Posting the same content in both will cause me to see duplicates.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is that due to the different defederation policies, if you want to communicate to the whole fediverse audience, you need to both.

      Hexbear, the 8th largest Lemmy instance, cannot access !fediverse@lemmy.world. They have to access !fediverse@lemmy.ml.

      On the other side, some users don’t want to subscribe to the .ml version due to the political background of the instance.

      So in the end anyone posting have to do it twice, otherwise the audience they want to reach won’t see their content.

      Posting the same content in both will cause me to see duplicates.

      That’s exactly one of the issues I was pointing out in the post. There should be a unique !fediverse community. But as soon as you suggest this idea, people come saying that the only one should be their one (see above). Which brings you to the audience fragmentation.

        • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Sh.itjust.works, the 4th biggest instance, is defederated by beehaw, the 7th largest instance.

          Should the 2357 monthly active users of Sh.itjust.works just leave to another instance to be able to access Beehaw communities?

          It’s also your choice to subscribe to both communities. If you only subscribe to one, then the problem is solved.

          • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Beehaw defederated with instances because they didn’t want to interact with its users. If the users of those instances migrate to another instance en masse, then Beehaw will defederate with that instance as well. Give up on interacting with Beehaw, because they don’t want the same things that people not registered on Beehaw want.

            • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              And also, to give some weight to Beehaw’s position, there was a thread two days ago about refederating with SJW in !support@beehaw.org .

              A few minutes after the discussion started a SJW account started to post pictures of feces.

            • wheeldawg@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              We need a replacement for subredditdrama to learn about this stuff. I’ve heard of the instance, but don’t know anything about the site’s opinions, or how I feel about being defd from them.

            • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I guess that boils down to the point I was asking about in the OP.

              Can we/should we have a single community when people can post updates about tools, evolution, etc. of the Lemmy platform, or will people who want to bring content to that audience have to post to all the local !fediverse communities of the instances clusters?

      • PopularUsername@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It would be nice if they developed some way to merge communities and splice crossposts together. This is a common issue with many communities.

      • JuxtaposedJaguar@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The issue is that due to the different defederation policies, if you want to communicate to the whole fediverse audience, you need to both.

        Besides Beehaw, have any other big instances defederated from lemmy.world? I don’t think defederation is a widespread issue.

        • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean, beehaw is the 7th biggest.

          LW also defederated from Hexbear, which is the 8th biggest.

          Beehaw also defederated from SJW, which is the 4th biggest.

          https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list

          The tensions between user bases probably justify the defederations, but it bring the issue I showed in the OP about having a community where all Lemmy users can discuss the platform together.

  • C4d@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Let it be. The duplication problem is all over the Fediverse. Over time some of those communities will die out and some will become more distinctive or specialised, attracting specific engagement in their own right; the problem will solve itself.

  • Margot Robbie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like having different communities on the same topic having completely different posts. Makes things feel less boring.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is when it’s the exact same content, just duplicated, which is the case for the Fediverse ones

  • mark@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s unfortunate, but I doubt anything will be done about this. Guess we have to get used to seeing the same posts, and repeating ourselves in threads a lot.

  • tjhart85@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    To be fair, to some of us this is a feature not a bug.

    A technology post on a technology/infosec/IT focused instance seems to have a COMPLETELY different focus and conversation than one on the larger instances, for example and I don’t want those mixed in with people saying that AI is a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.

    There are smaller dedicated art focused instances popping up too. I’d expect that they’re going to have a better set of conversations around those subjects than the same threads on a general instance and I don’t want those mixed up.

    If it’s a subject I really want to see a lot of discussion about, I’ll look at multiple threads… can this mean that some subjects won’t have as good of a conversation because people aren’t bouncing off of each other? Yeah, absolutely and that frankly SUCKS, but, as stated, it also means that some of the niche conversations have a chance to grow where they may have previously just been unseen due to how many people are talking.

    To me, they’re on different instances for a reason, let it grow organically. The ones that stand out will wind up being the main ones people use.

    As for amount of users. A decent amount of those are likely alts people created when instances were having problems or just to try out the different locations.
    Or, people just didn’t like the Fediverse for all the reasons you stated, which is also possible, but I don’t necessarily think chasing numbers should be the end all goal

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      A technology post on a technology/infosec/IT focused instance seems to have a COMPLETELY different focus and conversation than one on the larger instances, for example and I don’t want those mixed in with people saying that AI is a Jewish conspiracy to take over the world.

      Completely agree, and I mentioned that in the post as well.

      The issue with the current two Fediverse communities on . world and .ml is that they are pretty much the same. There is no adding values in posting and discussing the same things twice.

      • tjhart85@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, but, I don’t see how that really changes anything.

        On a smaller instance (or one that’s defederated from others … in either direction), that might very well completely shift focuses.

        For the Fediverse specific community, if you want one with the most chance of getting to the developers, use the instance that they’re on, otherwise, I’d think to just let the cultures develop and diverge naturally as they’re likely to.

        • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the issue I have is that I feel that in the last few days, the content seems more stale.

          That’s why I had a look at active users and noted that we were fewer.

          One potential way to address this would be to have one community to be the announcement one to the rest of the Fediverse.

          Today, it feels like getting information to people is a hassle. They arrive on the platform, they subscribe to the top communities, and then what? How are they supposed to learn about LASIM, that if they move to a smaller instance for better performance they might have to ask their admin to run LCS to get a populated All feed, that they can have a look at !trendingcommunities@feddit.nl for rising communities?

          We probably lack a reference website to answer all of these questions.

  • Adderbox76@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Respectfully, who cares?

    Hard truth… you’re not important. None of us are. No one cares enough about your opinions that they need you to “maximize your reach” by posting in multiple places. That is entirely a you problem, not an us problem.

    No one is forcing you to post everything multiple times to multiple communities. You’re free to choose one and post to it. if it’s interesting enough, someone will likely share it to other communities. And if it isn’t interesting enough, they won’t. Simple as that.

    that’s… how… it… works

    Also, you talk as though browsing r/all on Reddit doesn’t also show multiple copies of the same post sent to multiple communities. Of course it does. Declaring something the “main” community isn’t going to change that anyway.

    • Clymene@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t understand these “That’s just how the world is. Shame on you for discussing it” comments. I think it is very much worth discussing this, even if the conclusion of the discussion is that it’s not worth changing after all.

      You point out similar dynamics on Reddit, but it’s obviously not exactly the same. The design of Reddit is such that there is a much stronger tendency for main communities to arise. By contrast, lots of smaller communities on Lemmy look like ghost towns, where they would be much healthier if they combined numbers. “You’re free to do whatever” doesn’t address the systemic issue.

      That said, I don’t think this is obvious either way. There are tons of benefits to the current system too. That’s why it’s worth coming back to this topic every once in a while. If these sorts of nitty gritty design discussions bore you, why are you on this community?

    • ZodiacSF1969@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is a really shitty way to express your disagreement.

      And the fragmentation is definitely an issue worth discussing. It’s a lot more prominent here, in my opinion, than reddit, and that could discourage potential users.

  • Draconic NEO@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I know some people are going to complain about me saying this but I think that it’s good to have two separate ones for redundancy in case an instance is down, because when the instance goes down even though the copies are available posts made to them don’t get federated to others, they’re essentially only seen by people on the server that posts them.

    So it’s good to have multiple versions in case a server is down so that at least one of them will still be federating correctly.

    • Blaze@discuss.tchncs.deOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You could have the same security by having “Fediverse - Main” and “Fediverse - Backup”, making it more clear where people should post to