GiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThe recession should probably be here by nowwww.axios.comexternal-linkmessage-square56fedilinkarrow-up141arrow-down18
arrow-up133arrow-down1external-linkThe recession should probably be here by nowwww.axios.comGiddyGap@lemm.ee to News@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square56fedilink
minus-squareGiddyGap@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·1 year agoSure, but that’s not what recession means.
minus-squareGiddyGap@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down2·1 year agoI get what you’re talking about, but you can’t just make up your own definitions based on anecdotal evidence.
minus-squareGiddyGap@lemm.eeOPlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down1·1 year agoI agree that those things are hard if you’re not already a homeowner or you need to buy a new car, but those things don’t constitute a recession.
minus-squareafraid_of_zombies@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoAnother proof that economists are not disinterested and instead work for the banks.
deleted by creator
Sure, but that’s not what recession means.
deleted by creator
I get what you’re talking about, but you can’t just make up your own definitions based on anecdotal evidence.
deleted by creator
I agree that those things are hard if you’re not already a homeowner or you need to buy a new car, but those things don’t constitute a recession.
deleted by creator
Another proof that economists are not disinterested and instead work for the banks.