• SaltSong@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 个月前

    they have been too cheap thus far.

    I’m pretty sure that Bezos had enough money to bribe moderate chunks of the army.

    • Carmakazi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 个月前

      Personnel is one thing.

      Modern warfighting is outrageously expensive. Guided munitions can cost hundreds of thousands each. Armored vehicles cost millions. Combat aircraft, tens of millions. And it continues to cost tons of money just to keep them in a bunker ready to go.

      They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

      There is a reason they’re all too happy to keep letting you and me indirectly fund their military aspirations through taxes.

      • CitizenBrain@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        You can have all the expensive equipment you want. They don’t have the numbers. When your enemies are all around you and this military historically fucking sucks at combating insurgency, you’re going to lose.

        The military would be smart to tell this dude to pound sand before they, and a bunch of people die in a new civil war that they can’t win against the most armed civilian population on the planet.

      • SaltSong@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 个月前

        They will balk at the cost of owning/operating even a single Arleigh-Burke destroyer.

        They don’t need one. They need a sniper.

      • Ledericas@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 个月前

        its mostly asymmetrical/cyberwarefare now anyways. russia and china are both are good at this, but not militarily.