alphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agoIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1741arrow-down177
arrow-up1664arrow-down1imageIts not wrong thoughlemmy.worldalphacyberranger@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squarenewIdentity@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·1 year agoA decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down6·1 year agoAnd? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc? It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
minus-squareover_clox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down8·1 year agoYou’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.
A decompiler won’t give you the source code. Just some code that might not even necessarily work when compiled back.
And? Decompilers aren’t for noobs. So what if it gives you variable and function names like A000, A001, etc?
It can still lead a seasoned programmer where to go in the raw machine code to mod some things.
You’re actually chatting with a hacker that made No-CD hacks.