• fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    ·
    1 month ago

    One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn’t try and make the “ACPI” extensions somehow Windows-specific. If seems unfortunate if we do this work and get our partners to do the work and the result is that Linux works great without having to do the work. … Maybe we couid define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not the others even if they are open. Or maybe we could patent something relaled to this.

    This is insane… Isn’t it like the textbook definition of lobbying?

    No, that’d be something along the lines of racketeering and/or bribery. Lobbying is trying to influence someone to do something. If you do it with nice words that’s not typically much of a problem. But when you say you’re going to make sure they’re going to earn a lot of money from doing X then that’s bribery.

    • mle@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      I[t] seems unfortunate if we do this work and […] the result is that Linux works great without having to do the work. …

      Man I just don’t get this mindset of “it was hard for me, can’t have it be easy for someone else. Even if it takes additional work, I’ll make sure the next person struggles at least as much as me”. It’s like companies designing a great product and then spending additional develpment time making sure it’s not user repairable, even if it means compromising a good design.

      We’d still be in the stone age if everyone thougt like that.

  • John Richard@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    I wasn’t expecting to find a whole conspiracy while trying to fix my Deck, perhaps the memo is a hoax or something, but this all just lines up so naturally.

    My experience is that it is intentional, just like countless other examples of monopolistic anti-competition behavior. Especially with gaming, where a duopoly of video card manufacturers has spent the last several years intentionally crippling virtual GPU support on consumer-grade hardware. There are many others to blame though since Windows is designed to collect as much telemetry as possible, making it near impossible to fully disable its collection. There are entire forensic analysis toolkits dedicated to the troves of data that Windows stores on nearly every activity you perform. So while Microsoft’s actions may clearly violate antitrust legislation, the intelligence agencies saw Microsoft as their biggest ally & worked to help them maintain the status quo.

  • Wilco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Billionaires are a cancer on society. No healthy economy can survive the corruption that billionaires create. These people could do amazing things and change society for the better … but all of them decide that evil suits them.

  • yesman@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 month ago

    Does anyone use Microsoft because they like the software? Because all I ever hear is “I need it for games”, “I need it for work”, or “It’s the only system that works with my hardware”.

    One wonders what the market share for OSs would look like if people were able to freely choose what software they liked.

    • psivchaz@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      To be honest… If tomorrow WINE was 100% perfect, we’d probably see laptops start moving the direction of phones and it would be terrible for consumers. You’d get your AceOS on your Acer laptop and DellSys on your Dell and so on and they’d all have little marketplaces where you could install LibreOffice next to an ad for some other office suite that costs $100 for some reason and that’s all people would know.

      Yes, techy people would have more options but for the average consumer, they have no idea what an OS is. Many don’t know what Windows is. They don’t care or want to care. If presented with the average Linux install screen, supposing they could make it that far by figuring out how to make a bootable flash drive, they’d freak out at all the options and information presented. They’re at the mercy of the manufacturer, and the manufacturer will want to squeeze out every last dollar, and being given control over the OS would be terrible.

      • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 month ago

        The problem is that apart from a handful of geeks (a lot of which tend to gather on sites like this one), nobody is interested in computers. Which admittedly has consequences since computers are definitely interested in them. But then getting people interested in anything nowadays isn’t very easy.

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 days ago

      Until someone can come up with a decent alternative to Active Directory, the vast majority of office computers will remain under Microsoft control

  • Crashumbc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    Microsoft has been pulling this since the 80s… Bill Gates was personally responsible for destroying WordPerfect, dbase,etc competing office software.

    • AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      They also did that stuff with DR-DOS, they’ve been pulling dirty tricks with all their competition since the beginning with little or no consequences.

      And people whine because their laptops sometimes don’t work with Linux when it’s actually a fucking miracle that almost all machines currently work flawlessly despite all the hardware having been specifically designed to be hostile to anything that isn’t Windows.

  • skisnow@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 month ago

    I remember they once tried some similar shit with the Kerberos protocol, sneaking a patented feature in there so they could then seize the whole thing in the name of Active Directory, but I think they were forced to back down(?)

    I’m actually having difficulty finding details on it now because they’ve done a solid job drowning the story out from the search results…

  • luciole (he/him)@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    Kind of half related, but Microsoft loves to fuck with dual booting as well in various ways. Just last year a security patch broke dual booting, required a complicated workaround to get out of, and was only properly fixed 9 months later. Historically some “fast boot” shenanigans have been known to actually be “fucking with linux dual boot”. At this point if I need Windows for some adulting, it’s done in a virtual machine. Microsoft has simply lost their privilege to bare metal access on my PC.

    EDIT: Stories like this post are disheartening though, since they show that Microsoft can use their weight to make everyone else’s experience worst even if you completely avoid them.

  • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 month ago

    Check out the behind the bastards episodes on Gates. Even his charity foundation is just another way to exert control.

  • N0x0n@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 month ago

    After digging a bit the rabbit hole I’m still not sure I understand… But this issue is mostly related to portables devices (Laptops, Steam deck…), battery mangement and legacy BIOS?

    After going through this written blog post that’s what I “understand”.

    Another reason to hate Bill Gates !