• Anivia@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    30 days ago

    I saw this exact video the day of the attack, why is this article phrased as if it was released just now?

    • markko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      edit-2
      30 days ago

      Giving The Guardian the benefit of the doubt: because they took time to verify its authenticity before reporting on it.

      More likely reason: urgency and BREAKING NEWS gets more clicks.

  • venusaur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    30 days ago

    That’s so badass. As an FPV hobbyist this is like a fantasy. I’m curious though, why do they all say failsafe, yet they’re seemingly still in control of most of them. I see there’s no GPS lock. Maybe it calls failsafe when no GPS but doesn’t trigger the drone to shut down.

    • Obi@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      30 days ago

      Is that even beta flight? Never seen it configured like this, I know that’s what they were using at the beginning because that was basically the only FPV software available, but maybe they have a new “military-grade” one now?

      Also it’s interesting to see the different flying styles, some of them are like “let me carefully position myself slowly right next to this wing, yesss just right”, meanwhile their buddy just flies full speed ahead straight into it.

      • Valmond@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        30 days ago

        According to the Ukrainians they trained an AI on some of the target planes they had in museums (some of the strategic bombers blown up were actually handed over from Ukraine in the nineties to russia (alongside the nukes), and I guess they kept one or two as museum pieces), so it could be the AI carefully chosing the good spot to blow up

      • venusaur@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        30 days ago

        Yeah idk what config they’re using. Doesn’t look like any that I’ve used.

        Haha yeah and some look like they’re just falling from the sky. Not sure how the camera is facing straight down and moving down as well unless they just disarmed and let it fall.

  • Synapse@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    30 days ago

    I suppose all the planes where fully tanked up and ready to fly in order to be so flammable. I wonder if the damages would be so bad if a plan would be empty of fuel ?

    Also, why do they put tires on top ?

    • Valmond@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      30 days ago

      There is a video, with close up, of a loaded 101 cruise missile under the wing, those motherfuckers were loaded up and ready to go in the Zeus lightning operation, putin wanted it to be the biggest air attack in the war just before the “peace negotiations”. That didn’t pan out as expected lol.

      The exceptions are the two AWACS who seems to be kept for cannibalism (to keep the two-three flying ones with pieces they can no longer produce).

    • AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      29 days ago

      If they weren’t then they wouldn’t be full of fuel. Also, russia has been using these to launch cruise missiles at Ukraine.

      Edit: upon further viewing of the footage, some of the bombers even have missiles mounted to hard points on their wings when the drones hit them.