Chromium has better features, but with google announcing its plan to ‘drm the internet’ I 'm not sure if it’d be a good idea.

  • simple@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    148
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    What better features? Firefox has pretty much everything nowadays, and is as fast as Chrome.

    • Otter@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      88
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      From the comments I’m noticing a trend

      • Google Chromecast issues
      • Not allowed to do background effects in Google meet

      and from personal experience:

      • issues using the store to update add-ons on Google docs
      • can’t authenticate desktop Google drive

      I use a lot of Google products, but avoid Chrome because of nonsense like this. Firefox works fine for everything else EXCEPT certain Google products. Feels intentional

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Same with Edge and Microsoft with their Bing bullshit. Big anticonsumer bullies and they wonder why their online share is stuck.

      • Aggy@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 years ago

        I have the same experience. At my last company they only used Google meet so I had chrome on my computer just for meetings and nothing else.

      • pHr34kY@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 years ago

        The only time I use chromium is to attach a debugger to GWT (yes, the “G” stands for Google). It runs like absolute trash in Firefox.

        Everything else runs better in FF.

    • metaStatic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is exactly why companies spend money on marketing, people remember these ideas and internalize them as their justification long after it stops being true. And Chrome being fast hasn’t been true for a long time.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        It still wins most benchmarks, so it’s technically true. Although not really enough to matter on desktop where it’s millisecond differences

        • Lemminary@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 years ago

          I can confirm this, Chrome wins the benchmark tests and some CSS rendering but lags behind in DX. I’m not sure where OP got the idea that Firefox has fewer features from a developer POV.

    • Marks@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Edge’s vertical tabs and grouping. Every solution on Firefox feels half-baked.

    • GeekFTW@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Chromium browsers have only 1 feature I need: access to the Chromecast API. I have 3, Firefox can’t connect to them and the last 2-3 times I tried the listed 3rd party methods (fx bridge, etc), I could never get it to work.

      Were it not for that, I’d be back on Firefox.

      • Otter@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        That’s part of why I avoided getting new Chromecast devices 😄

          • king_tronzington@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            If you ever find one let me know because I’m in the exact same boat as you. Casting videos to my TV is so damn convenient

          • raptir@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            Microsoft Wireless Display Adapter. Despite being Microsoft, it uses Miracast.

            • MowFord@lemmy.world
              cake
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Isn’t Miracast an adhoc wifi network as opposed to simply connecting to an established WiFi network?

      • Dave@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 years ago

        I had a similar need, and it prevented me from moving to FireFox for a long while. Luckily, I did manage to get fx_cast to work, and it’s been flawless ever since. In fact, I’d say it work more reliably than Chrome’s casting!

    • Zerfallen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      On Android tablets, most non-Firefox browsers support a tab bar, and tablet optimised UI. Firefox is just a giant stretched phone layout. I like to use the same browser on all platforms so I can sync tabs, so Firefox being crap on my tablet rules it out for my other devices too.

    • Rooki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      even more you can import google addons into firefox ( right now only in nightly builds but it works )

    • AustralianSimon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Firefox always memory bloats out on me. Mobile app crashes.

      I switched to Brave then moved to Vivaldi. I’ll revisit if FF gets more stable.