sv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agoYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comexternal-linkmessage-square664fedilinkarrow-up12.19Karrow-down1131
arrow-up12.06Karrow-down1external-linkYoung climate activist tells Greenpeace to drop ‘old-fashioned’ anti-nuclear stancewww.theguardian.comsv1sjp@lemmy.world to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square664fedilink
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down4·2 years agoNo, I’m saying that saying the radiation concerns specifically of coal output isn’t a concern with regards to health.
minus-squareWomble@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down1·2 years agoYou’re right coal deaths are just confined to mines, respiratory illnesses and excess cancers from chronic low dose exposure.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years ago it’s fucking awful and causes way more deaths than nuclear power plants.
minus-squareWomble@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·2 years ago No, I’m saying that saying the radiation concerns specifically of coal output isn’t a concern with regards to health. So chronic low level exposure to radiation is fine?
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI’m not saying it’s fine, I’m saying it feels like an order of magnitude less of a concern compared to all of the other bad things that can happen from coal smoke.
No, I’m saying that saying the radiation concerns specifically of coal output isn’t a concern with regards to health.
You’re right coal deaths are just confined to mines, respiratory illnesses and excess cancers from chronic low dose exposure.
So chronic low level exposure to radiation is fine?
I’m not saying it’s fine, I’m saying it feels like an order of magnitude less of a concern compared to all of the other bad things that can happen from coal smoke.